Bongard-OpenWorld: Few-Shot Reasoning for Free-form Visual Concepts in the Real World
Rujie Wu, Xiaojian Ma, Zhenliang Zhang, Wei Wang, Qing Li, Song-Chun Zhu, Yizhou Wang
Abstract
We introduce Bongard-OpenWorld, a new benchmark for evaluating real-world few-shot reasoning for machine vision. It originates from the classical Bongard Problems (BPs): Given two sets of images (positive and negative), the model needs to identify the set that query images belong to by inducing the visual concepts, which is exclusively depicted by images from the positive set. Our benchmark inherits the few-shot concept induction of the original BPs while adding the two novel layers of challenge: 1) open-world free-form concepts, as the visual concepts in Bongard-OpenWorld are unique compositions of terms from an open vocabulary, ranging from object categories to abstract visual attributes and commonsense factual knowledge; 2) real-world images, as opposed to the synthetic diagrams used by many counterparts. In our exploration, Bongard-OpenWorld already imposes a significant challenge to current few-shot reasoning algorithms. We further investigate to which extent the recently introduced Large Language Models (LLMs) and Vision-Language Models (VLMs) can solve our task, by directly probing VLMs, and combining VLMs and LLMs in an interactive reasoning scheme. We even conceived a neuro-symbolic reasoning approach that reconciles LLMs & VLMs with logical reasoning to emulate the human problem-solving process for Bongard Problems. However, none of these approaches manage to close the human-machine gap, as the best learner achieves 64% accuracy while human participants easily reach 91%. We hope Bongard-OpenWorld can help us better understand the limitations of current visual intelligence and facilitate future research on visual agents with stronger few-shot visual reasoning capabilities.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext ab8ad452-5f85-4748-81e7-99b52dbc10cdCited by top-tier papers7
- Defeasible Visual Entailment: Benchmark, Evaluator, and Reward-Driven OptimizationYue Zhang, Liqiang Jing, Vibhav GogateAAAI 2025 · 13 citations
- Bongard-RWR+: Real-World Representations of Fine-Grained Concepts in Bongard ProblemsSzymon Pawlonka, Mikołaj Małkiński, Jacek MańdziukICLR 2026 · 7 citations
- Synthesizing Visual Concepts as Vision-Language ProgramsAntonia Wüst, Wolfgang Stammer, Hikaru Shindo, Lukas Helff et al.CVPR 2026 · 6 citations
- VisRes Bench: On Evaluating the Visual Reasoning Capabilities of VLMsBrigitta Malagurski Törtei, Yasser Dahou, Ngoc Dung Huynh, Wamiq Reyaz Para et al.CVPR 2026 · 3 citations
- Co-LoRA: Collaborative Model Personalization on Heterogeneous Multi-Modal ClientsMinhyuk Seo, Taeheon Kim, Hankook Lee, Jonghyun Choi et al.ICLR 2026
Builds on19
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language SupervisionAlec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh et al.ICML 2021 · 47,906 citations
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- BLIP-2: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training with Frozen Image Encoders and Large Language ModelsJunnan Li, Dongxu Li, Silvio Savarese, Steven C. H. HoiICML 2023 · 7,873 citations
- A ConvNet for the 2020sZhuang Liu, Hanzi Mao, Chao-Yuan Wu, Christoph Feichtenhofer et al.CVPR 2022 · 6,782 citations
Related papers
- Bongard-HOI: Benchmarking Few-Shot Visual Reasoning for Human-Object InteractionsHuaizu Jiang, Xiaojian Ma, Weili Nie, Zhiding Yu et al.CVPR 2022 · 22 citations
- Reasoning Limitations of Multimodal Large Language Models. A case study of Bongard ProblemsMikolaj Malkinski, Szymon Pawlonka, Jacek MandziukICML 2025
- Bongard-LOGO: A New Benchmark for Human-Level Concept Learning and ReasoningWeili Nie, Zhiding Yu, Lei Mao, Ankit B. Patel et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 107 citations
- Bongard in Wonderland: Visual Puzzles that Still Make AI Go Mad?Antonia Wüst, Tim Nelson Tobiasch, Lukas Helff, Inga Ibs et al.ICML 2025
- VisuLogic: A Benchmark for Evaluating Visual Reasoning in Multi-modal Large Language ModelsWeiye Xu, Jiahao Wang, Weiyun Wang, Zhe Chen et al.ICLR 2026 · 103 citations
