VisRes Bench: On Evaluating the Visual Reasoning Capabilities of VLMs
Brigitta Malagurski Törtei, Yasser Dahou, Ngoc Dung Huynh, Wamiq Reyaz Para, Phuc H. Le-Khac, Ankit Singh, Sofian Chaybouti, Sanath Narayan
Abstract
Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have achieved remarkable progress across tasks such as visual question answering and image captioning. Yet, the extent to which these models perform visual reasoning as opposed to relying on linguistic priors remains unclear. To address this, we introduce VisRes Bench, a benchmark designed to study visual reasoning in naturalistic settings without contextual language supervision. Analyzing model behavior across three levels of complexity, we uncover clear limitations in perceptual and relational visual reasoning capacities. VisRes isolates distinct reasoning abilities across its levels. Level 1 probes perceptual completion and global image matching under perturbations such as blur, texture changes, occlusion, and rotation; Level 2 tests rule-based inference over a single attribute (e.g., color, count, orientation); and Level 3 targets compositional reasoning that requires integrating multiple visual attributes. Across more than 19,000 controlled task images, we find that state-of-the-art VLMs perform near random under subtle perceptual perturbations, revealing limited abstraction beyond pattern recognition. We conclude by discussing how VisRes provides a unified framework for advancing abstract visual reasoning in multimodal research.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext e6d6c11e-16a7-4bb1-8d59-7ae1bad4cf6eBuilds on12
- CLEVRER: Collision Events for Video Representation and ReasoningKexin Yi, Chuang Gan, Yunzhu Li, Pushmeet Kohli et al.ICLR 2020 · 584 citations
- VisuLogic: A Benchmark for Evaluating Visual Reasoning in Multi-modal Large Language ModelsWeiye Xu, Jiahao Wang, Weiyun Wang, Zhe Chen et al.ICLR 2026 · 103 citations
- Vision Language Models are BiasedAn Vo, Khai-Nguyen Nguyen, Mohammad Reza Taesiri, Thi Tuong Vy Dang et al.ICLR 2026 · 68 citations
- Enigmata: Scaling Logical Reasoning in Large Language Models with Synthetic Verifiable PuzzlesJiangjie Chen, Qianyu He, Siyu Yuan, Aili Chen et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 60 citations
- V-PROM: A Benchmark for Visual Reasoning Using Visual Progressive MatricesDamien Teney, Peng Wang, Jiewei Cao, Lingqiao Liu et al.AAAI 2020 · 37 citations
Related papers
- MathSight: A Benchmark Exploring Have Vision-Language Models Really Seen in University-Level Mathematical Reasoning?Yuandong Wang, Yao Cui, Yuxin Zhao, Zhen Yang et al.ACL 2026
- VS-Bench: Evaluating VLMs for Strategic Abilities in Multi-Agent EnvironmentsZelai Xu, Zhexuan Xu, Xiangmin Yi, Huining Yuan et al.CVPR 2026 · 3 citations
- VisuRiddles: Fine-grained Perception is a Primary Bottleneck for Multimodal Large Language Models in Abstract Visual ReasoningHao Yan, Xingchen Liu, Hao Wang, Zhenbiao Cao et al.ICLR 2026 · 7 citations
- GeoBench: Rethinking Multimodal Geometric Problem-Solving via Hierarchical EvaluationYuan Feng, Yue Yang, Xiaohan He, Jiatong Zhao et al.ICLR 2026 · 4 citations
- ProgressLM: Towards Progress Reasoning in Vision-Language ModelsJianshu Zhang, Chengxuan Qian, Haosen Sun, Haoran Lu et al.ACL 2026 · 7 citations
