CLEVRER: Collision Events for Video Representation and Reasoning
Kexin Yi, Chuang Gan, Yunzhu Li, Pushmeet Kohli, Jiajun Wu, Antonio Torralba, Joshua B. Tenenbaum
Abstract
The ability to reason about temporal and causal events from videos lies at the core of human intelligence. Most video reasoning benchmarks, however, focus on pattern recognition from complex visual and language input, instead of on causal structure. We study the complementary problem, exploring the temporal and causal structures behind videos of objects with simple visual appearance. To this end, we introduce the CoLlision Events for Video REpresentation and Reasoning (CLEVRER) dataset, a diagnostic video dataset for systematic evaluation of computational models on a wide range of reasoning tasks. Motivated by the theory of human causal judgment, CLEVRER includes four types of question: descriptive (e.g., 'what color'), explanatory ('what's responsible for'), predictive ('what will happen next'), and counterfactual ('what if'). We evaluate various state-of-the-art models for visual reasoning on our benchmark. While these models thrive on the perceptionbased task (descriptive), they perform poorly on the causal tasks (explanatory, predictive and counterfactual), suggesting that a principled approach for causal reasoning should incorporate the capability of both perceiving complex visual and language inputs, and understanding the underlying dynamics and causal relations. We also study an oracle model that explicitly combines these components via symbolic representations.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 912e9670-1b4b-400f-acbd-9ee863bcd997Cited by top-tier papers187
- Object-Centric Learning with Slot AttentionFrancesco Locatello, Dirk Weissenborn, Thomas Unterthiner, Aravindh Mahendran et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 1,275 citations
- Conditional Object-Centric Learning from VideoThomas Kipf, Gamaleldin Fathy Elsayed, Aravindh Mahendran, Austin Stone et al.ICLR 2022 · 290 citations
- CATER: A diagnostic dataset for Compositional Actions & TEmporal ReasoningRohit Girdhar, Deva RamananICLR 2020 · 198 citations
- PlasticineLab: A Soft-Body Manipulation Benchmark with Differentiable PhysicsZhiao Huang, Yuanming Hu, Tao Du, Siyuan Zhou et al.ICLR 2021 · 164 citations
- Medical Visual Question Answering via Conditional ReasoningLi-Ming Zhan, Bo Liu, Lu Fan, Jiaxin Chen et al.ACM MM 2020 · 157 citations
Builds on1
Related papers
- Grounding Physical Concepts of Objects and Events Through Dynamic Visual ReasoningZhenfang Chen, Jiayuan Mao, Jiajun Wu, Kwan-Yee Kenneth Wong et al.ICLR 2021 · 13 citations
- From Representation to Reasoning: Towards both Evidence and Commonsense Reasoning for Video Question-AnsweringJiangtong Li, Li Niu, Liqing ZhangCVPR 2022 · 48 citations
- Compositional 4D Dynamic Scenes Understanding with Physics Priors for Video Question AnsweringXingrui Wang, Wufei Ma, Angtian Wang, Shuo Chen et al.ICLR 2025
- ACQUIRED: A Dataset for Answering Counterfactual Questions In Real-Life VideosTe-Lin Wu, Zi-Yi Dou, Qingyuan Hu, Yu Hou et al.EMNLP 2023 · 3 citations
- A Very Big Video Reasoning SuiteMaijunxian Wang, Ruisi Wang, Juyi Lin, Ran Ji et al.ICML 2026 · 20 citations
