Enigmata: Scaling Logical Reasoning in Large Language Models with Synthetic Verifiable Puzzles
Jiangjie Chen, Qianyu He, Siyu Yuan, Aili Chen, Zhicheng Cai, Weinan Dai, Hongli Yu, Jiaze Chen, Xuefeng Li, Qiying Yu, Hao Zhou, Mingxuan Wang
Abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs), such as OpenAI's o1 and DeepSeek's R1, excel at advanced reasoning tasks like math and coding via Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR), but still struggle with puzzles solvable by humans without domain knowledge. We introduce Enigmata, the first comprehensive suite tailored for improving LLMs with puzzle reasoning skills. It includes 36 tasks across seven categories, each with 1) a generator that produces unlimited examples with controllable difficulty and 2) a rule-based verifier for automatic evaluation. This generator-verifier design supports scalable, multi-task RL training, fine-grained analysis, and seamless RLVR integration. We further propose Enigmata-Eval, a rigorous benchmark, and develop optimized multi-task RLVR strategies. Our trained model, Qwen2.5-32B-Enigmata, consistently surpasses o3-mini-high and o1 on the puzzle reasoning benchmarks like Enigmata-Eval, ARC-AGI (32.8%), and ARC-AGI 2 (0.6%). It also generalizes well to out-of-domain puzzle benchmarks and mathematical reasoning, with little multi-tasking trade-off. When trained on larger models like Seed1.5-Thinking (20B activated parameters and 200B total parameters), puzzle data from Enigmata further boosts SoTA performance on advanced math and STEM reasoning tasks such as AIME (2024-2025), BeyondAIME and GPQA (Diamond), showing nice generalization benefits of Enigmata. This work offers a unified, controllable framework for advancing logical reasoning in LLMs. Resources of this work can be found at https://seed-enigmata.github.io.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 1c339576-e3f6-44cd-aec4-845d97f101e8Cited by top-tier papers10
- Good SFT Optimizes for SFT, Better SFT Prepares for Reinforcement LearningDylan Zhang, Yufeng Xu, Haojin Wang, Qingzhi Chen et al.ICML 2026 · 8 citations
- Mirage or Method? How Model–Task Alignment Induces Divergent RL ConclusionsHaoze Wu, Cheng Wang, Wenshuo Zhao, Junxian HeICLR 2026 · 7 citations
- HardcoreLogic: Challenging Large Reasoning Models with Long-tail Logic Puzzle GamesJingcong Liang, Shijun Wan, Xuehai Wu, Yitong Li et al.ICLR 2026 · 6 citations
- VisRes Bench: On Evaluating the Visual Reasoning Capabilities of VLMsBrigitta Malagurski Törtei, Yasser Dahou, Ngoc Dung Huynh, Wamiq Reyaz Para et al.CVPR 2026 · 3 citations
- Leibniz: Theory-of-Mind Driven Neuro-Symbolic Logical Reasoning via Multi-Agent CollaborationYue Fan, Hu Zhang, Yunxiao Zhao, Guangjun Zhang et al.ACL 2026
Builds on10
- DAPO: An Open-Source LLM Reinforcement Learning System at ScaleQiying Yu, Zheng Zhang, Ruofei Zhu, Yufeng Yuan et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 2,828 citations
- Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttentionWoosuk Kwon, Zhuohan Li, Siyuan Zhuang, Ying Sheng et al.SOSP 2023 · 1,016 citations
- Open-Reasoner-Zero: An Open Source Approach to Scaling Up Reinforcement Learning on the Base ModelJingcheng Hu, Yinmin Zhang, Qi Han, Daxin Jiang et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 533 citations
- Reinforcement Learning for Reasoning in Large Language Models with One Training ExampleYiping Wang, Qing Yang, Zhiyuan Zeng, Liliang Ren et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 314 citations
- DeepMath-103K: A Large-Scale, Challenging, Decontaminated, and Verifiable Mathematical Dataset for Advancing ReasoningZhiwei He, Tian Liang, Jiahao Xu, Qiuzhi Liu et al.ICLR 2026 · 271 citations
Related papers
- SATQuest: A Verifier for Logical Reasoning Evaluation and Reinforcement Fine-Tuning of LLMsYanxiao Zhao, Yaqian Li, Zihao Bo, Rinyoichi Takezoe et al.ACL 2026
- SATBench: Benchmarking LLMs' Logical Reasoning via Automated Puzzle Generation from SAT FormulasAnjiang Wei, Yuheng Wu, Yingjia Wan, Tarun Suresh et al.EMNLP 2025 · 1 citation
- JudgeBoard: Benchmarking and Enhancing Small Language Models for Reasoning EvaluationZhenyu Bi, Gaurav Srivastava, Yang Li, Swastik Roy et al.AAAI 2026
- J1: Incentivizing Thinking in LLM-as-a-Judge via Reinforcement LearningChenxi Whitehouse, Tianlu Wang, Ping Yu, Xian Li et al.ICLR 2026 · 74 citations
- SynLogic: Synthesizing Verifiable Reasoning Data at Scale for Learning Logical Reasoning and BeyondJunteng Liu, Yuanxiang Fan, Zhuo Jiang, Han Ding et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 49 citations
