SATQuest: A Verifier for Logical Reasoning Evaluation and Reinforcement Fine-Tuning of LLMs
Yanxiao Zhao, Yaqian Li, Zihao Bo, Rinyoichi Takezoe, Haojia Hui, Mo Guang, Lei Ren, Xiaolin Qin, Kaiwen Long
Abstract
Recent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable general reasoning capabilities. However, systematically evaluating and enhancing these reasoning capabilities is challenging due to the lack of controllable and scalable tools for fine-grained analysis. Existing benchmarks and datasets often lack the necessary variable control for multi-dimensional, systematic analysis and training, or have narrow problem types and formats. To address these limitations, we introduce SATQuest, a systematic verifier designed to evaluate and enhance logical reasoning in LLMs by generating diverse, Satisfiability-based logical reasoning problems directly from Conjunctive Normal Form (CNF) instances. SATQuest structures these problems along three orthogonal dimensions: instance scale, problem type, and question format, employing randomized, SAT-based problem generation and objective answer verification via PySAT. This design mitigates memorization issues, allows for nuanced insights into reasoning performance, and enables effective reinforcement fine-tuning. Our extensive evaluation of various LLMs using SATQuest identified significant limitations in their logical reasoning, particularly in generalizing beyond familiar mathematical formats. Furthermore, we show that reinforcement fine-tuning with SATQuest rewards substantially improves targeted task performance and generalizes to more complex instances, while highlighting remaining challenges in cross-format adaptation. Through these demonstrations, we showcase SATQuest's potential as a foundational tool and a valuable starting point for advancing LLM logical reasoning.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext fef42e98-f5bc-41a8-aa53-362fe38d6648Builds on5
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Measuring Massive Multitask Language UnderstandingDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou et al.ICLR 2021 · 7,905 citations
- LiveBench: A Challenging, Contamination-Limited LLM BenchmarkColin White, Samuel Dooley, Manley Roberts, Arka Pal et al.ICLR 2025
- BIG-Bench Extra HardMehran Kazemi, Bahare Fatemi, Hritik Bansal, John Palowitch et al.ACL 2025
Related papers
- SATBench: Benchmarking LLMs' Logical Reasoning via Automated Puzzle Generation from SAT FormulasAnjiang Wei, Yuheng Wu, Yingjia Wan, Tarun Suresh et al.EMNLP 2025 · 1 citation
- SATURN: SAT-based Reinforcement Learning to Unleash LLMs ReasoningHuanyu Liu, Ge Li, Jia Li, Hao Zhu et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 1 citation
- SynLogic: Synthesizing Verifiable Reasoning Data at Scale for Learning Logical Reasoning and BeyondJunteng Liu, Yuanxiang Fan, Zhuo Jiang, Han Ding et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 49 citations
- General-Reasoner: Advancing LLM Reasoning Across All DomainsXueguang Ma, Qian Liu, Dongfu Jiang, Ge Zhang et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 153 citations
- Unleashing LLM Reasoning Capability via Scalable Question Synthesis from ScratchYuyang Ding, Xinyu Shi, Xiaobo Liang, Juntao Li et al.ACL 2025
