SATURN: SAT-based Reinforcement Learning to Unleash LLMs Reasoning
Huanyu Liu, Ge Li, Jia Li, Hao Zhu, Kechi Zhang, Yihong Dong
Abstract
How to design reinforcement learning (RL) tasks that effectively unleash the reasoning capability of large language models (LLMs) remains an open question. Existing RL tasks (e.g., math, programming, and constructing reasoning tasks) face three key limitations: ❶ Scalability. They rely heavily on human annotation or expensive LLM synthesis to generate sufficient training data. ❷ Verifiability. LLMs' outputs are hard to verify automatically and reliably. ❸ Controllable Difficulty. Most tasks lack fine-grained difficulty control, making it challenging to train LLMs from easy to hard and progressively develop reasoning capability. To address these limitations, we propose SATURN, a SAT-based RL framework that uses Boolean Satisfiability (SAT) problems to train and evaluate LLM reasoning. SATURN enables scalable task construction, rule-based verification, and precise difficulty control. SATURN designs a curriculum learning pipeline that continuously improves LLMs' reasoning capability by constructing SAT tasks of increasing difficulty and training LLMs from easy to hard. To ensure stable training, we design a principled mechanism to control difficulty transitions. We introduce SATURN-2.6k, a dataset of 2,660 SAT problems with varying difficulty. It supports the evaluation of how LLM reasoning changes with problem difficulty. We apply SATURN to DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen and obtain SATURN-1.5B and SATURN-7B. We achieve several notable results: ❶ On SAT problems, SATURN-1.5B and SATURN-7B achieve average pass@3 improvements of +14.0 and +28.1, respectively. ❷ On math and programming tasks, SATURN-1.5B and SATURN-7B improve average scores by +4.9 and +1.8 on benchmarks (e.g., AIME, LiveCodeBench). ❸ Compared to the state-of-the-art (SOTA) approach in constructing RL tasks, SATURN achieves further improvements of +8.8%. We release the source code, data, and models to support future research at https: //github.com/gtxygyzb/Saturn-code.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 49f98e11-e10e-4169-abbb-571b7b123a5cBuilds on10
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Let's Verify Step by StepHunter Lightman, Vineet Kosaraju, Yuri Burda, Harrison Edwards et al.ICLR 2024 · 3,045 citations
- Take a Step Back: Evoking Reasoning via Abstraction in Large Language ModelsHuaixiu Steven Zheng, Swaroop Mishra, Xinyun Chen, Heng-Tze Cheng et al.ICLR 2024 · 216 citations
- Self-playing Adversarial Language Game Enhances LLM ReasoningPengyu Cheng, Tianhao Hu, Han Xu, Zhisong Zhang et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 120 citations
Related papers
- SATQuest: A Verifier for Logical Reasoning Evaluation and Reinforcement Fine-Tuning of LLMsYanxiao Zhao, Yaqian Li, Zihao Bo, Rinyoichi Takezoe et al.ACL 2026
- AceReason-Nemotron: Advancing Math and Code Reasoning through Reinforcement LearningYang Chen, Zhuolin Yang, Zihan Liu, Chankyu Lee et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 79 citations
- General-Reasoner: Advancing LLM Reasoning Across All DomainsXueguang Ma, Qian Liu, Dongfu Jiang, Ge Zhang et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 153 citations
- Curriculum Reinforcement Learning from Easy to Hard Tasks Improves LLM ReasoningShubham Parashar, Shurui Gui, Xiner Li, Hongyi Ling et al.ICLR 2026 · 112 citations
- SATBench: Benchmarking LLMs' Logical Reasoning via Automated Puzzle Generation from SAT FormulasAnjiang Wei, Yuheng Wu, Yingjia Wan, Tarun Suresh et al.EMNLP 2025 · 1 citation
