Scale-Localized Abstract Reasoning
Yaniv Benny, Niv Pekar, Lior Wolf
Abstract
We consider the abstract relational reasoning task, which is commonly used as an intelligence test. Since some patterns have spatial rationales, while others are only semantic, we propose a multi-scale architecture that processes each query in multiple resolutions. We show that indeed different rules are solved by different resolutions and a combined multi-scale approach outperforms the existing state of the art in this task on all benchmarks by 5-54%. The success of our method is shown to arise from multiple novelties. First, it searches for relational patterns in multiple resolutions, which allows it to readily detect visual relations, such as location, in higher resolution, while allowing the lower resolution module to focus on semantic relations, such as shape type. Second, we optimize the reasoning network of each resolution proportionally to its performance, hereby we motivate each resolution to specialize on the rules for which it performs better than the others and ignore cases that are already solved by the other resolutions. Third, we propose a new way to pool information along the rows and the columns of the illustration-grid of the query. Our work also analyses the existing benchmarks, demonstrating that the RAVEN dataset selects the negative examples in a way that is easily exploited. We, therefore, propose a modified version of the RAVEN dataset, named RAVEN-FAIR. Our code and pretrained models are available at https://github.com/yanivbenny/MRNet .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 77e88cba-4741-42a3-944d-50c0a032d84aCited by top-tier papers18
- Hierarchical ConViT with Attention-Based Relational Reasoner for Visual Analogical ReasoningWentao He, Jialu Zhang, Jianfeng Ren, Ruibin Bai et al.AAAI 2023 · 22 citations
- Generating Correct Answers for Progressive Matrices Intelligence TestsNiv Pekar, Yaniv Benny, Lior WolfNeurIPS 2020 · 17 citations
- Neural Prediction Errors enable Analogical Visual Reasoning in Human Standard Intelligence TestsLingxiao Yang, Hongzhi You, Zonglei Zhen, Dahui Wang et al.ICML 2023 · 16 citations
- Learning Visual Abstract Reasoning through Dual-Stream NetworksKai Zhao, Chang Xu, Bailu SiAAAI 2024 · 11 citations
- Slot Abstractors: Toward Scalable Abstract Visual ReasoningShanka Subhra Mondal, Jonathan D. Cohen, Taylor Whittington WebbICML 2024 · 10 citations
Builds on2
Related papers
- V-PROM: A Benchmark for Visual Reasoning Using Visual Progressive MatricesDamien Teney, Peng Wang, Jiewei Cao, Lingqiao Liu et al.AAAI 2020 · 37 citations
- One Self-Configurable Model to Solve Many Abstract Visual Reasoning ProblemsMikolaj Malkinski, Jacek MandziukAAAI 2024 · 10 citations
- Few-shot Visual Reasoning with Meta-Analogical Contrastive LearningYoungsung Kim, Jinwoo Shin, Eunho Yang, Sung Ju HwangNeurIPS 2020 · 30 citations
- Learning to reason over visual objectsShanka Subhra Mondal, Taylor Whittington Webb, Jonathan CohenICLR 2023 · 7 citations
- Cognitive Predictive Coding Network: Rethinking the Generalization in Raven's Progressive MatricesXinyu Zhang, Lingling Zhang, Yanrui Wu, Muye Huang et al.ACM MM 2025
