Stratified Rule-Aware Network for Abstract Visual Reasoning
Sheng Hu, Yuqing Ma, Xianglong Liu, Yanlu Wei, Shihao Bai
Abstract
Abstract reasoning refers to the ability to analyze information, discover rules at an intangible level, and solve problems in innovative ways. Raven's Progressive Matrices (RPM) test is typically used to examine the capability of abstract reasoning. The subject is asked to identify the correct choice from the answer set to fill the missing panel at the bottom right of RPM (e.g., a 3×3 matrix), following the underlying rules inside the matrix. Recent studies, taking advantage of Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), have achieved encouraging progress to accomplish the RPM test. However, they partly ignore necessary inductive biases of RPM solver, such as order sensitivity within each row/column and incremental rule induction. To address this problem, in this paper we propose a Stratified Rule-Aware Network (SRAN) to generate the rule embeddings for two input sequences. Our SRAN learns multiple granularity rule embeddings at different levels, and incrementally integrates the stratified embedding flows through a gated fusion module. With the help of embeddings, a rule similarity metric is applied to guarantee that SRAN can not only be trained using a tuplet loss but also infer the best answer efficiently. We further point out the severe defects existing in the popular RAVEN dataset for RPM test, which prevent from the fair evaluation of the abstract reasoning ability. To fix the defects, we propose an answer set generation algorithm called Attribute Bisection Tree (ABT), forming an improved dataset named Impartial-RAVEN (I-RAVEN for short). Extensive experiments are conducted on both PGM and I-RAVEN datasets, showing that our SRAN outperforms the state-of-the-art models by a considerable margin.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext b50ca0ad-ecef-40d0-a3df-fc68ead7d3a2Cited by top-tier papers33
- Hierarchical ConViT with Attention-Based Relational Reasoner for Visual Analogical ReasoningWentao He, Jialu Zhang, Jianfeng Ren, Ruibin Bai et al.AAAI 2023 · 22 citations
- Unfolding Spatial Cognition: Evaluating Multimodal Models on Visual SimulationsLinjie Li, Mahtab Bigverdi, Jiawei Gu, Zixian Ma et al.ICLR 2026 · 22 citations
- Neural Prediction Errors enable Analogical Visual Reasoning in Human Standard Intelligence TestsLingxiao Yang, Hongzhi You, Zonglei Zhen, Dahui Wang et al.ICML 2023 · 16 citations
- In-Context Analogical Reasoning with Pre-Trained Language ModelsXiaoyang Hu, Shane Storks, Richard L. Lewis, Joyce ChaiACL 2023 · 13 citations
- NAPGuard: Towards Detecting Naturalistic Adversarial PatchesSiyang Wu, Jiakai Wang, Jiejie Zhao, Yazhe Wang et al.CVPR 2024 · 11 citations
Builds on1
Related papers
- Towards Generative Abstract Reasoning: Completing Raven's Progressive Matrix via Rule Abstraction and SelectionFan Shi, Bin Li, Xiangyang XueICLR 2024 · 5 citations
- Raven's Progressive Matrices Completion with Latent Gaussian Process PriorsFan Shi, Bin Li, Xiangyang XueAAAI 2021 · 10 citations
- Learning Visual Abstract Reasoning through Dual-Stream NetworksKai Zhao, Chang Xu, Bailu SiAAAI 2024 · 11 citations
- Effective Abstract Reasoning with Dual-Contrast NetworkTao Zhuo, Mohan S. KankanhalliICLR 2021 · 48 citations
- Learning to reason over visual objectsShanka Subhra Mondal, Taylor Whittington Webb, Jonathan CohenICLR 2023 · 7 citations
