BDoS: Blockchain Denial-of-Service
Michael Mirkin, Yan Ji, Jonathan Pang, Ariah Klages-Mundt, Ittay Eyal, Ari Juels
Abstract
Proof-of-work (PoW) cryptocurrency blockchains like Bitcoin secure vast amounts of money. Their operators, called miners, expend resources to generate blocks and receive monetary rewards for their effort. Blockchains are, in principle, attractive targets for Denial-of-Service (DoS) attacks: There is fierce competition among coins, as well as potential gains from short selling. Classical DoS attacks, however, typically target a few servers and cannot scale to systems with many nodes. There have been no successful DoS attacks to date against prominent cryptocurrencies. We present Blockchain DoS (BDoS), the first incentive-based DoS attack that targets PoW cryptocurrencies. Unlike classical DoS, BDoS targets the system's mechanism design: It exploits the reward mechanism to discourage miner participation. Previous DoS attacks against PoW blockchains require an adversary's mining power to match that of all other miners. In contrast, BDoS can cause a blockchain to grind to a halt with significantly fewer resources, e.g., 21% as of March 2020 in Bitcoin, according to our empirical study. We find that Bitcoin's vulnerability to BDoS increases rapidly as the mining industry matures and profitability drops. BDoS differs from known attacks like Selfish Mining in its aim not to increase an adversary's revenue, but to disrupt the system. Although it bears some algorithmic similarity to those attacks, it introduces a new adversarial model, goals, algorithm, and game-theoretic analysis. Beyond its direct implications for operational blockchains, BDoS introduces the novel idea that an adversary can manipulate miners' incentives by proving the existence of blocks without actually publishing them.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers9
- MAD-HTLC: Because HTLC is Crazy-Cheap to AttackItay Tsabary, Matan Yechieli, Alex Manuskin, Ittay EyalS&P 2021 · 87 citations
- Speculative Denial-of-Service Attacks In EthereumAviv Yaish, Kaihua Qin, Liyi Zhou, Aviv Zohar et al.USENIX Security 2024 · 38 citations
- Sprints: Intermittent Blockchain PoW MiningMichael Mirkin, Lulu Zhou, Ittay Eyal, Fan ZhangUSENIX Security 2024 · 8 citations
- Prrr: Personal Random Rewards for Blockchain ReportingHongyin Chen, Yubin Ke, Xiaotie Deng, Ittay EyalS&P 2026 · 2 citations
- SoK: Decentralized Finance (DeFi) AttacksLiyi Zhou, Xihan Xiong, Jens Ernstberger, Stefanos Chaliasos et al.S&P 2023
Builds on8
- On the Security and Performance of Proof of Work BlockchainsArthur Gervais, Ghassan O. Karame, Karl Wüst, Vasileios Glykantzis et al.CCS 2016 · 1,668 citations
- Hijacking Bitcoin: Routing Attacks on CryptocurrenciesMaria Apostolaki, Aviv Zohar, Laurent VanbeverS&P 2017 · 473 citations
- On the Instability of Bitcoin Without the Block RewardMiles Carlsten, Harry A. Kalodner, S. Matthew Weinberg, Arvind NarayananCCS 2016 · 387 citations
- Ouroboros Genesis: Composable Proof-of-Stake Blockchains with Dynamic AvailabilityChristian Badertscher, Peter Gazi, Aggelos Kiayias, Alexander Russell et al.CCS 2018 · 306 citations
- Be Selfish and Avoid Dilemmas: Fork After Withholding (FAW) Attacks on BitcoinYujin Kwon, Dohyun Kim, Yunmok Son, Eugene Y. Vasserman et al.CCS 2017 · 248 citations
Related papers
- Towards Automatic Discovery of Denial of Service Weaknesses in Blockchain Resource ModelsFeng Luo, Huangkun Lin, Zihao Li, Xiapu Luo et al.CCS 2024 · 4 citations
- Risk-free Selfish Mining in Hybrid Predictability Model. A Case Study on Polkadot's NPoSMingfei Zhang, Rujia Li, Xinyu Lei, Sisi DuanWWW 2026
- Power Adjusting and Bribery Racing: Novel Mining Attacks in the Bitcoin SystemShang Gao, Zecheng Li, Zhe Peng, Bin XiaoCCS 2019 · 81 citations
- Modeling the Impact of Network Connectivity on Consensus Security of Proof-of-Work BlockchainYang Xiao, Ning Zhang, Wenjing Lou, Y. Thomas HouINFOCOM 2020 · 52 citations
- Fairness Matters: A Tit-For-Tat Strategy Against Selfish MiningWeijie Sun, Zihuan Xu, Lei ChenVLDB 2022 · 8 citations
