Ouroboros Genesis: Composable Proof-of-Stake Blockchains with Dynamic Availability
Christian Badertscher, Peter Gazi, Aggelos Kiayias, Alexander Russell, Vassilis Zikas
Abstract
We present a novel Proof-of-Stake (PoS) protocol, Ouroboros Genesis, that enables parties to safely join (or rejoin) the protocol execution using only the genesis block information. Prior to our work, PoS protocols either required parties to obtain a trusted "checkpoint" block upon joining and, furthermore, to be frequently online or required an accurate estimate of the number of online parties to be hardcoded into the protocol logic. This ability of new parties to "bootstrap from genesis" was a hallmark property of the Bitcoin blockchain and was considered an important advantage of PoW-based blockchains over PoS-based blockchains since it facilitates robust operation in a setting with dynamic availability, i.e., the natural setting-without external trusted objects such as checkpoint blocks-where parties come and go arbitrarily, may join at any moment, or remain offline for prolonged periods of time. We prove the security of Ouroboros Genesis against a fully adaptive adversary controlling less than half of the total stake in a partially synchronous network with unknown message delay and unknown, varying levels of party availability. Our security proof is in the Universally Composable setting assuming the most natural abstraction of a hash function, known as the strict Global Random Oracle (ACM-CCS 2014); this highlights an important advantage of PoS blockchains over their PoW counterparts in terms of composability with respect to the hash function formalisation: rather than a strict GRO, PoW-based protocol security requires a "local" random oracle. Finally, proving the security of our construction against an adaptive adversary requires a novel martingale technique that may be of independent interest in the analysis of blockchain protocols.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 30f0d832-28ab-4c8d-bf6e-3f693c96a52fCited by top-tier papers34
- Proof-of-Stake SidechainsPeter Gazi, Aggelos Kiayias, Dionysis ZindrosS&P 2019 · 222 citations
- Redactable Blockchain in the Permissionless SettingDominic Deuber, Bernardo Magri, Sri Aravinda Krishnan ThyagarajanS&P 2019 · 153 citations
- Ebb-and-Flow Protocols: A Resolution of the Availability-Finality DilemmaJoachim Neu, Ertem Nusret Tas, David TseS&P 2021 · 105 citations
- Towards Scalable Threshold CryptosystemsAlin Tomescu, Robert Chen, Yiming Zheng, Ittai Abraham et al.S&P 2020 · 102 citations
- Ouroboros Crypsinous: Privacy-Preserving Proof-of-StakeThomas Kerber, Aggelos Kiayias, Markulf Kohlweiss, Vassilis ZikasS&P 2019 · 82 citations
Builds on1
Related papers
- The Combinatorics of the Longest-Chain Rule: Linear Consistency for Proof-of-Stake BlockchainsErica Blum, Aggelos Kiayias, Cristopher Moore, Saad Quader et al.SODA 2020 · 18 citations
- On the Limits of Consensus under Dynamic Availability and ReconfigurationJavier Nieto, Joachim Neu, Ling RenCCS 2026 · 2 citations
- On the Anonymity Guarantees of Anonymous Proof-of-Stake ProtocolsMarkulf Kohlweiss, Varun Madathil, Kartik Nayak, Alessandra ScafuroS&P 2021 · 13 citations
- Bitcoin-Enhanced Proof-of-Stake Security: Possibilities and ImpossibilitiesErtem Nusret Tas, David Tse, Fangyu Gai, Sreeram Kannan et al.S&P 2023
- Unbiasable Verifiable Random FunctionsEmanuele Giunta, Alistair StewartEUROCRYPT 2024 · 8 citations
