Ebb-and-Flow Protocols: A Resolution of the Availability-Finality Dilemma
Joachim Neu, Ertem Nusret Tas, David Tse
Abstract
The CAP theorem says that no blockchain can be live under dynamic participation and safe under temporary network partitions. To resolve this availability-finality dilemma, we formulate a new class of flexible consensus protocols, ebb-and-flow protocols, which support a full dynamically available ledger in conjunction with a finalized prefix ledger. The finalized ledger falls behind the full ledger when the network partitions but catches up when the network heals. Gasper, the current candidate protocol for Ethereum 2.0’s beacon chain, combines the finality gadget Casper FFG with the LMD GHOST fork choice rule and aims to achieve this property. However, we discovered an attack in the standard synchronous network model, highlighting a general difficulty with existing finality-gadget-based designs. We present a construction of provably secure ebb-and-flow protocols with optimal resilience. Nodes run an off-the-shelf dynamically available protocol, take snapshots of the growing available ledger, and input them into a separate off-the-shelf BFT protocol to finalize a prefix. We explore connections with flexible BFT and improve upon the state-of-the-art for that problem.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 0df65de0-ccc8-4af7-a02f-09b7519a9fd0Cited by top-tier papers18
- PrestigeBFT: Revolutionizing View Changes in BFT Consensus Algorithms with Reputation MechanismsGengrui Zhang, Fei Pan, Sofia Tijanic, Hans-Arno JacobsenICDE 2024 · 21 citations
- Interchain Timestamping for Mesh SecurityErtem Nusret Tas, Runchao Han, David Tse, Mingchao YuCCS 2023 · 13 citations
- Optimal Flexible Consensus and its Application to EthereumJoachim Neu, Srivatsan Sridhar, Lei Yang, David TseS&P 2024 · 12 citations
- Blockchain Bribing Attacks and the Efficacy of CounterincentivesDimitris Karakostas, Aggelos Kiayias, Thomas ZachariasCCS 2024 · 5 citations
- Minotaur: Multi-Resource Blockchain ConsensusMatthias Fitzi, Xuechao Wang, Sreeram Kannan, Aggelos Kiayias et al.CCS 2022 · 5 citations
Builds on6
- Ouroboros Genesis: Composable Proof-of-Stake Blockchains with Dynamic AvailabilityChristian Badertscher, Peter Gazi, Aggelos Kiayias, Alexander Russell et al.CCS 2018 · 306 citations
- Prism: Deconstructing the Blockchain to Approach Physical LimitsVivek Kumar Bagaria, Sreeram Kannan, David Tse, Giulia Fanti et al.CCS 2019 · 256 citations
- OHIE: Blockchain Scaling Made SimpleHaifeng Yu, Ivica Nikolic, Ruomu Hou, Prateek SaxenaS&P 2020 · 166 citations
- Flexible Byzantine Fault ToleranceDahlia Malkhi, Kartik Nayak, Ling RenCCS 2019 · 122 citations
- Everything is a Race and Nakamoto Always WinsAmir Dembo, Sreeram Kannan, Ertem Nusret Tas, David Tse et al.CCS 2020 · 3 citations
Related papers
- Constant Latency and Finality for Dynamically Available DAGHans Schmiedel, Runchao Han, Qiang Tang, Ron Steinfeld et al.S&P 2025
- Greedy Attack: Breaking Finality against VeChain Proof-of-Authority Consensus ProtocolRujia Li, Qin Wang, Haochen Wang, Xueqian Lu et al.WWW 2026
- Does Finality Gadget Finalize Your Block? A Case Study of Binance ConsensusRujia Li, Jingyuan Ding, Qin Wang, Keting Jia et al.USENIX Security 2025
- Accountable LivenessAndrew Lewis-Pye, Joachim Neu, Tim Roughgarden, Luca ZanoliniCCS 2025
- A Decentralized Blockchain with High Throughput and Fast ConfirmationChenxing Li, Peilun Li, Dong Zhou, Zhe Yang et al.USENIX ATC 2020 · 172 citations
