Minotaur: Multi-Resource Blockchain Consensus
Matthias Fitzi, Xuechao Wang, Sreeram Kannan, Aggelos Kiayias, Nikos Leonardos, Pramod Viswanath, Gerui Wang
Abstract
Resource-based consensus is the backbone of permissionless distributed ledger systems. The security of such protocols relies fundamentally on the level of resources actively engaged in the system. The variety of different resources (and related proof protocols, some times referred to as PoX in the literature) raises the fundamental question whether it is possible to utilize many of them in tandem and build multi-resource consensus protocols. The challenge in combining different resources is to achieve fungibility between them, in the sense that security would hold as long as the cumulative adversarial power across all resources is bounded. In this work, we put forth Minotaur, a multi-resource blockchain consensus protocol that combines proof-of-work (PoW) and proofof-stake (PoS), and we prove it optimally fungible. At the core of our design, Minotaur operates in epochs while continuously sampling the active computational power to provide a fair exchange between the two resources, work and stake. Further, we demonstrate the ability of Minotaur to handle a higher degree of work fluctuation as compared to the Bitcoin blockchain; we also generalize Minotaur to any number of resources. We demonstrate the simplicity of Minotaur via implementing a full stack client in Rust (available open source [25] ). We use the client to test the robustness of Minotaur to variable mining power and combined work/stake attacks and demonstrate concrete empirical evidence towards the suitability of Minotaur to serve as the consensus layer of a real-world blockchain.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext b4630b6b-cf8a-4f1a-b124-4942a1d36f0eBuilds on4
- Ebb-and-Flow Protocols: A Resolution of the Availability-Finality DilemmaJoachim Neu, Ertem Nusret Tas, David TseS&P 2021 · 105 citations
- The Combinatorics of the Longest-Chain Rule: Linear Consistency for Proof-of-Stake BlockchainsErica Blum, Aggelos Kiayias, Cristopher Moore, Saad Quader et al.SODA 2020 · 18 citations
- Everything is a Race and Nakamoto Always WinsAmir Dembo, Sreeram Kannan, Ertem Nusret Tas, David Tse et al.CCS 2020 · 3 citations
- Securing Parallel-chain Protocols under Variable Mining PowerXuechao Wang, Viswa Virinchi Muppirala, Lei Yang, Sreeram Kannan et al.CCS 2021
Related papers
- Bitcoin-Enhanced Proof-of-Stake Security: Possibilities and ImpossibilitiesErtem Nusret Tas, David Tse, Fangyu Gai, Sreeram Kannan et al.S&P 2023
- Resource-Restricted Cryptography: Revisiting MPC Bounds in the Proof-of-Work EraJuan A. Garay, Aggelos Kiayias, Rafail M. Ostrovsky, Giorgos Panagiotakos et al.EUROCRYPT 2020 · 22 citations
- High-Throughput Permissionless Blockchain Consensus Under Realistic Network AssumptionsSandro Coretti, Matthias Fitzi, Aggelos Kiayias, Giorgos Panagiotakos et al.CRYPTO 2025
- Proof-of-Work-Based Consensus in Expected-Constant TimeJuan A. Garay, Aggelos Kiayias, Yu ShenEUROCRYPT 2024 · 12 citations
- Sprints: Intermittent Blockchain PoW MiningMichael Mirkin, Lulu Zhou, Ittay Eyal, Fan ZhangUSENIX Security 2024 · 8 citations
