Prism: Deconstructing the Blockchain to Approach Physical Limits
Vivek Kumar Bagaria, Sreeram Kannan, David Tse, Giulia Fanti, Pramod Viswanath
Abstract
The concept of a blockchain was invented by Satoshi Nakamoto to maintain a distributed ledger. In addition to its security, important performance measures of a blockchain protocol are its transaction throughput and confirmation latency. In a decentralized setting, these measures are limited by two underlying physical network attributes: communication capacity and speed-of-light propagation delay. In this work we introduce Prism, a new proof-of-work blockchain protocol, which can achieve 1) security against up to 50% adversarial hashing power; 2) optimal throughput up to the capacity C of the network; 3) confirmation latency for honest transactions proportional to the propagation delay D, with confirmation error probability exponentially small in the bandwidth-delay product CD; 4) eventual total ordering of all transactions. Our approach to the design of this protocol is based on deconstructing Nakamoto's blockchain into its basic functionalities and systematically scaling up these functionalities to approach their physical limits.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers31
- Narwhal and Tusk: a DAG-based mempool and efficient BFT consensusGeorge Danezis, Lefteris Kokoris-Kogias, Alberto Sonnino, Alexander SpiegelmanEuroSys 2022 · 259 citations
- A Decentralized Blockchain with High Throughput and Fast ConfirmationChenxing Li, Peilun Li, Dong Zhou, Zhe Yang et al.USENIX ATC 2020 · 172 citations
- Ebb-and-Flow Protocols: A Resolution of the Availability-Finality DilemmaJoachim Neu, Ertem Nusret Tas, David TseS&P 2021 · 105 citations
- Dumbo-NG: Fast Asynchronous BFT Consensus with Throughput-Oblivious LatencyYingzi Gao, Yuan Lu, Zhenliang Lu, Qiang Tang et al.CCS 2022 · 72 citations
- Utilizing Parallelism in Smart Contracts on Decentralized Blockchains by Taming Application-Inherent ConflictsPéter Garamvölgyi, Yuxi Liu, Dong Zhou, Fan Long et al.ICSE 2022 · 31 citations
Builds on3
- Enhancing Bitcoin Security and Performance with Strong Consistency via Collective SigningEleftherios Kokoris-Kogias, Philipp Jovanovic, Nicolas Gailly, Ismail Khoffi et al.USENIX Security 2016 · 769 citations
- OHIE: Blockchain Scaling Made SimpleHaifeng Yu, Ivica Nikolic, Ruomu Hou, Prateek SaxenaS&P 2020 · 166 citations
- A Better Method to Analyze Blockchain ConsistencyLucianna Kiffer, Rajmohan Rajaraman, Abhi ShelatCCS 2018 · 149 citations
Related papers
- Security-Performance Tradeoff in DAG-based Proof-of-Work Blockchain ProtocolsShichen Wu, Puwen Wei, Ren Zhang, Bowen JiangNDSS 2024
- NC-Max: Breaking the Security-Performance Tradeoff in Nakamoto ConsensusRen Zhang, Dingwei Zhang, Quake Wang, Shichen Wu et al.NDSS 2022
- High-Throughput Permissionless Blockchain Consensus Under Realistic Network AssumptionsSandro Coretti, Matthias Fitzi, Aggelos Kiayias, Giorgos Panagiotakos et al.CRYPTO 2025
- Tight Consistency Bounds for BitcoinPeter Gazi, Aggelos Kiayias, Alexander RussellCCS 2020
- The Generals' Scuttlebutt: Byzantine-Resilient Gossip ProtocolsSandro Coretti, Aggelos Kiayias, Cristopher Moore, Alexander RussellCCS 2022 · 23 citations
