Prrr: Personal Random Rewards for Blockchain Reporting
Hongyin Chen, Yubin Ke, Xiaotie Deng, Ittay Eyal
Abstract
Smart contracts, the stateful programs running on blockchains, often rely on reports. Publishers are paid to publish these reports on the blockchain. Designing protocols that incentivize timely reporting is the prevalent reporting problem. But existing solutions face a security-performance trade-off: Relying on a small set of trusted publishers introduces centralization risks, while allowing open publication results in an excessive number of reports on the blockchain. We identify the root cause of this trade-off to be the standard symmetric reward design, which treats all reports equally. We prove that no symmetric-reward mechanism can overcome the trade-off. We present Personal Random Rewards for Reporting (Prrr), a protocol that assigns random heterogeneous values to reports. We call this novel mechanism-design concept Ex-Ante Synthetic Asymmetry. To the best of our knowledge, Prrr is the first game-theoretic mechanism (in any context) that deliberately forms participant asymmetry. Prrr employs a second-price-style settlement to allocate rewards, ensuring incentive compatibility and achieving both security and efficiency. Following the protocol constitutes a Subgame-Perfect Nash Equilibrium, robust against collusion and Sybil attacks. Prrr is applicable to numerous smart contracts that rely on timely reports.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 541895bd-7f72-4d6c-989d-cab9fafab17dCited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on16
- Flash Boys 2.0: Frontrunning in Decentralized Exchanges, Miner Extractable Value, and Consensus InstabilityPhilip Daian, Steven Goldfeder, Tyler Kell, Yunqi Li et al.S&P 2020 · 607 citations
- On the Instability of Bitcoin Without the Block RewardMiles Carlsten, Harry A. Kalodner, S. Matthew Weinberg, Arvind NarayananCCS 2016 · 387 citations
- XCLAIM: Trustless, Interoperable, Cryptocurrency-Backed AssetsAlexei Zamyatin, Dominik Harz, Joshua Lind, Panayiotis Panayiotou et al.S&P 2019 · 222 citations
- Order-Fairness for Byzantine ConsensusMahimna Kelkar, Fan Zhang, Steven Goldfeder, Ari JuelsCRYPTO 2020 · 152 citations
- zkBridge: Trustless Cross-chain Bridges Made PracticalTiancheng Xie, Jiaheng Zhang, Zerui Cheng, Fan Zhang et al.CCS 2022 · 131 citations
Related papers
- Collusion-Proof and Sybil-Proof Reward Mechanisms for Query Incentive NetworksYoujia Zhang, Pingzhong TangAAAI 2023 · 3 citations
- Breaking Omertà: On Threshold Cryptography, Smart Collusion, and WhistleblowingMahimna Kelkar, Aadityan Ganesh, Aditi Partap, Joseph Bonneau et al.CCS 2025 · 1 citation
- Towards Personalized Privacy-Preserving Incentive for Truth Discovery in Crowdsourced Binary-Choice Question AnsweringPeng Sun, Zhibo Wang, Yunhe Feng, Liantao Wu et al.INFOCOM 2020 · 39 citations
- Strictly Proper Contract Functions Can Be Arbitrage-FreeEric Neyman, Tim RoughgardenAAAI 2022 · 1 citation
- Adversarial Procurement in BlockchainsMaryam Bahrani, Michael Neuder, S. Matthew WeinbergCCS 2026
