Power Adjusting and Bribery Racing: Novel Mining Attacks in the Bitcoin System
Shang Gao, Zecheng Li, Zhe Peng, Bin Xiao
Abstract
Mining attacks allow attackers to gain an unfair share of the mining reward by deviating from the honest mining strategy in the Bitcoin system. Among the most well-known are block withholding (BWH), fork after withholding (FAW), and selfish mining. In this paper, we propose two new strategies: power adjusting and bribery racing, and introduce two novel mining attacks, Power Adjusting Withholding (PAW) and Bribery Selfish Mining (BSM) adopting the new strategies. Both attacks can increase the reward of attackers. Furthermore, we show PAW can avoid the "miner's dilemma" in BWH attacks. BSM introduces a new "venal miner's dilemma", which results in all targets (bribes) willing to help the attacker but getting less reward finally. Quantitative analyses and simulations are conducted to verify the effectiveness of our attacks. We propose some countermeasures to mitigate the new attacks, but a practical and efficient solution remains to be an open problem. CCS CONCEPTS • Security and privacy → Distributed systems security; Economics of security and privacy.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext aab6c54e-b74d-450d-868d-4bdf0f361bd6Cited by top-tier papers5
- Do the Rich Get Richer? Fairness Analysis for Blockchain IncentivesYuming Huang, Jing Tang, Qianhao Cong, Andrew Lim et al.SIGMOD 2021 · 40 citations
- P2B-Trace: Privacy-Preserving Blockchain-based Contact Tracing to Combat PandemicsZhe Peng, Cheng Xu, Haixin Wang, Jinbin Huang et al.SIGMOD 2021 · 31 citations
- An empirical study of blockchain system vulnerabilities: modules, types, and patternsXiao Yi, Daoyuan Wu, Lingxiao Jiang, Yuzhou Fang et al.FSE 2022 · 22 citations
- How Hard is Takeover in DPoS Blockchains? Understanding the Security of Coin-based Voting GovernanceChao Li, Balaji Palanisamy, Runhua Xu, Li Duan et al.CCS 2023 · 17 citations
- Under the Dark: A Systematical Study of Stealthy Mining Pools (Ab)use in the WildZhenrui Zhang, Geng Hong, Xiang Li, Zhuoqun Fu et al.CCS 2023 · 9 citations
Builds on4
- On the Security and Performance of Proof of Work BlockchainsArthur Gervais, Ghassan O. Karame, Karl Wüst, Vasileios Glykantzis et al.CCS 2016 · 1,668 citations
- On the Instability of Bitcoin Without the Block RewardMiles Carlsten, Harry A. Kalodner, S. Matthew Weinberg, Arvind NarayananCCS 2016 · 387 citations
- Be Selfish and Avoid Dilemmas: Fork After Withholding (FAW) Attacks on BitcoinYujin Kwon, Dohyun Kim, Yunmok Son, Eugene Y. Vasserman et al.CCS 2017 · 248 citations
- Bitcoin vs. Bitcoin Cash: Coexistence or Downfall of Bitcoin Cash?Yujin Kwon, Hyoungshick Kim, Jinwoo Shin, Yongdae KimS&P 2019 · 51 citations
Related papers
- BDoS: Blockchain Denial-of-ServiceMichael Mirkin, Yan Ji, Jonathan Pang, Ariah Klages-Mundt et al.CCS 2020 · 1 citation
- Fairness Matters: A Tit-For-Tat Strategy Against Selfish MiningWeijie Sun, Zihuan Xu, Lei ChenVLDB 2022 · 8 citations
- Risk-free Selfish Mining in Hybrid Predictability Model. A Case Study on Polkadot's NPoSMingfei Zhang, Rujia Li, Xinyu Lei, Sisi DuanWWW 2026
- Bitcoin Under Volatile Block Rewards: How Mempool Statistics Can Influence Bitcoin MiningRoozbeh Sarenche, Alireza Aghabagherloo, Svetla Nikova, Bart PreneelCCS 2025 · 1 citation
- Modeling the Impact of Network Connectivity on Consensus Security of Proof-of-Work BlockchainYang Xiao, Ning Zhang, Wenjing Lou, Y. Thomas HouINFOCOM 2020 · 52 citations
