DeepLTL: Learning to Efficiently Satisfy Complex LTL Specifications for Multi-Task RL
Mathias Jackermeier, Alessandro Abate
Abstract
Linear temporal logic (LTL) has recently been adopted as a powerful formalism for specifying complex, temporally extended tasks in multi-task reinforcement learning (RL). However, learning policies that efficiently satisfy arbitrary specifications not observed during training remains a challenging problem. Existing approaches suffer from several shortcomings: they are often only applicable to finite-horizon fragments of LTL, are restricted to suboptimal solutions, and do not adequately handle safety constraints. In this work, we propose a novel learning approach to address these concerns. Our method leverages the structure of Büchi automata, which explicitly represent the semantics of LTL specifications, to learn policies conditioned on sequences of truth assignments that lead to satisfying the desired formulae. Experiments in a variety of discrete and continuous domains demonstrate that our approach is able to zero-shot satisfy a wide range of finite- and infinite-horizon specifications, and outperforms existing methods in terms of both satisfaction probability and efficiency. Code available at: https://deep-ltl.github.io/
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 80550394-c444-48e9-9f5e-280fa2d3d5a0Cited by top-tier papers8
- One Subgoal at a Time: Zero-Shot Generalization to Arbitrary Linear Temporal Logic Requirements in Multi-Task Reinforcement LearningZijian Guo, Ilker Isik, H. M. Sabbir Ahmad, Wenchao LiNeurIPS 2025 · 13 citations
- Ground-Compose-Reinforce: Grounding Language in Agentic Behaviours using Limited DataAndrew C. Li, Toryn Q. Klassen, Andrew Wang, Parand A. Alamdari et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 5 citations
- Automaton Constrained Q-LearningAnastasios Manganaris, Vittorio Giammarino, Ahmed H. QureshiNeurIPS 2025 · 3 citations
- Good-for-MDP State Reduction for Stochastic LTL PlanningChristoph Weinhuber, Giuseppe De Giacomo, Yong Li, Sven Schewe et al.AAAI 2026 · 2 citations
- Imitation Learning with Temporal Logic ConstraintsZining Fan, He ZhuNeurIPS 2025 · 2 citations
Builds on11
- Compositional Reinforcement Learning from Logical SpecificationsKishor Jothimurugan, Suguman Bansal, Osbert Bastani, Rajeev AlurNeurIPS 2021 · 112 citations
- LTL2Action: Generalizing LTL Instructions for Multi-Task RLPashootan Vaezipoor, Andrew C. Li, Rodrigo Toro Icarte, Sheila A. McIlraithICML 2021 · 106 citations
- Instructing Goal-Conditioned Reinforcement Learning Agents with Temporal Logic ObjectivesWenjie Qiu, Wensen Mao, He ZhuNeurIPS 2023 · 44 citations
- The Logical Options FrameworkBrandon Araki, Xiao Li, Kiran Vodrahalli, Jonathan A. DeCastro et al.ICML 2021 · 44 citations
- Policy Optimization with Linear Temporal Logic ConstraintsCameron Voloshin, Hoang Minh Le, Swarat Chaudhuri, Yisong YueNeurIPS 2022 · 28 citations
Related papers
- Accelerated Learning with Linear Temporal Logic using Differentiable SimulationAlper Kamil Bozkurt, Calin Belta, Ming C. LinICLR 2026 · 2 citations
- Eventual Discounting Temporal Logic Counterfactual Experience ReplayCameron Voloshin, Abhinav Verma, Yisong YueICML 2023 · 24 citations
- Deductive Synthesis of Reinforcement Learning Agents for Infinite Horizon TasksYuning Wang, He ZhuCAV 2025
- Constrained LTL Specification Learning from ExamplesChangjian Zhang, Parv Kapoor, Ian Dardik, Leyi Cui et al.ICSE 2025 · 4 citations
- Skill Machines: Temporal Logic Skill Composition in Reinforcement LearningGeraud Nangue Tasse, Devon Jarvis, Steven James, Benjamin RosmanICLR 2024 · 12 citations
