Imitation Learning with Temporal Logic Constraints
Zining Fan, He Zhu
Abstract
Designing reinforcement learning agents to satisfy complex temporal objectives expressed in Linear Temporal Logic (LTL), presents significant challenges, particularly in ensuring sample efficiency and task alignment over infinite horizons. Recent works have shown that by leveraging the corresponding Limit Deterministic Büchi Automaton (LDBA) representation, LTL formulas can be translated into variable discounting schemes over LDBA-accepting states to maximize a lower bound on the probability of formula satisfaction. However, the resulting reward signals are inherently sparse, making exploration of LDBA-accepting states increasingly difficult as task horizons lengthen to infinity. In this work, we address these challenges by leveraging finite-length demonstrations to overcome the exploration bottleneck for LTL objectives over infinite horizons. We segment agent exploratory trajectories at LDBA-accepting states and iteratively guide the agent within each segment to learn to efficiently reach these accepting states. By incentivizing the agent to visit LDBA-accepting states from arbitrary states, our approach increases the probability of LTL formula satisfaction without the need for extensive or lengthy demonstrations. We demonstrate the applicability of our method in a variety of high-dimensional continuous control domains. It achieves faster convergence and consistently outperforms baseline approaches.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 20097fce-636a-4ef7-ade1-e3c8a69b3163Builds on12
- SQIL: Imitation Learning via Reinforcement Learning with Sparse RewardsSiddharth Reddy, Anca D. Dragan, Sergey LevineICLR 2020 · 299 citations
- Disagreement-Regularized Imitation LearningKianté Brantley, Wen Sun, Mikael HenaffICLR 2020 · 112 citations
- Compositional Reinforcement Learning from Logical SpecificationsKishor Jothimurugan, Suguman Bansal, Osbert Bastani, Rajeev AlurNeurIPS 2021 · 112 citations
- On the Expressivity of Markov RewardDavid Abel, Will Dabney, Anna Harutyunyan, Mark K. Ho et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 107 citations
- LTL2Action: Generalizing LTL Instructions for Multi-Task RLPashootan Vaezipoor, Andrew C. Li, Rodrigo Toro Icarte, Sheila A. McIlraithICML 2021 · 106 citations
Related papers
- DeepLTL: Learning to Efficiently Satisfy Complex LTL Specifications for Multi-Task RLMathias Jackermeier, Alessandro AbateICLR 2025
- Accelerated Learning with Linear Temporal Logic using Differentiable SimulationAlper Kamil Bozkurt, Calin Belta, Ming C. LinICLR 2026 · 2 citations
- Reinforcement Learning with LTL and ω-Regular Objectives via Optimality-Preserving Translation to Average RewardsXuan-Bach Le, Dominik Wagner, Leon Witzman, Alexander Rabinovich et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 17 citations
- One Subgoal at a Time: Zero-Shot Generalization to Arbitrary Linear Temporal Logic Requirements in Multi-Task Reinforcement LearningZijian Guo, Ilker Isik, H. M. Sabbir Ahmad, Wenchao LiNeurIPS 2025 · 13 citations
- Instructing Goal-Conditioned Reinforcement Learning Agents with Temporal Logic ObjectivesWenjie Qiu, Wensen Mao, He ZhuNeurIPS 2023 · 44 citations
