Compositional Reinforcement Learning from Logical Specifications
Kishor Jothimurugan, Suguman Bansal, Osbert Bastani, Rajeev Alur
Abstract
We study the problem of learning control policies for complex tasks given by logical specifications. Recent approaches automatically generate a reward function from a given specification and use a suitable reinforcement learning algorithm to learn a policy that maximizes the expected reward. These approaches, however, scale poorly to complex tasks that require high-level planning. In this work, we develop a compositional learning approach, called DIRL, that interleaves highlevel planning and reinforcement learning. First, DIRL encodes the specification as an abstract graph; intuitively, vertices and edges of the graph correspond to regions of the state space and simpler sub-tasks, respectively. Our approach then incorporates reinforcement learning to learn neural network policies for each edge (sub-task) within a Dijkstra-style planning algorithm to compute a high-level plan in the graph. An evaluation of the proposed approach on a set of challenging control benchmarks with continuous state and action spaces demonstrates that it outperforms state-of-the-art baselines. However, G ex by itself is insufficient to determine the optimal path-e.g., it does not know that there is no path leading directly from S 2 to S 3 , which is a property of the environment. These differences
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 3931f4d2-4fc8-41fa-9672-4a9057de3b50Cited by top-tier papers27
- Instructing Goal-Conditioned Reinforcement Learning Agents with Temporal Logic ObjectivesWenjie Qiu, Wensen Mao, He ZhuNeurIPS 2023 · 44 citations
- Leveraging Approximate Symbolic Models for Reinforcement Learning via Skill DiversityLin Guan, Sarath Sreedharan, Subbarao KambhampatiICML 2022 · 31 citations
- Compositional Policy Learning in Stochastic Control Systems with Formal GuaranteesDorde Zikelic, Mathias Lechner, Abhinav Verma, Krishnendu Chatterjee et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 31 citations
- Compositional Automata Embeddings for Goal-Conditioned Reinforcement LearningBeyazit Yalcinkaya, Niklas Lauffer, Marcell Vazquez-Chanlatte, Sanjit A. SeshiaNeurIPS 2024 · 26 citations
- E-MAPP: Efficient Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning with Parallel Program GuidanceCan Chang, Ni Mu, Jiajun Wu, Ling Pan et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 14 citations
Builds on5
- LTL2Action: Generalizing LTL Instructions for Multi-Task RLPashootan Vaezipoor, Andrew C. Li, Rodrigo Toro Icarte, Sheila A. McIlraithICML 2021 · 106 citations
- Neurosymbolic Reinforcement Learning with Formally Verified ExplorationGreg Anderson, Abhinav Verma, Isil Dillig, Swarat ChaudhuriNeurIPS 2020 · 91 citations
- Program Guided AgentShao-Hua Sun, Te-Lin Wu, Joseph J. LimICLR 2020 · 63 citations
- Synthesizing Programmatic Policies that Inductively GeneralizeJeevana Priya Inala, Osbert Bastani, Zenna Tavares, Armando Solar-LezamaICLR 2020 · 54 citations
- Neurosymbolic Transformers for Multi-Agent CommunicationJeevana Priya Inala, Yichen Yang, James Paulos, Yewen Pu et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 29 citations
Related papers
- The Logical Options FrameworkBrandon Araki, Xiao Li, Kiran Vodrahalli, Jonathan A. DeCastro et al.ICML 2021 · 44 citations
- Skill Discovery for Exploration and Planning using Deep Skill GraphsAkhil Bagaria, Jason K. Senthil, George KonidarisICML 2021 · 73 citations
- Programmatic Reinforcement Learning without OraclesWenjie Qiu, He ZhuICLR 2022 · 42 citations
- DHRL: A Graph-Based Approach for Long-Horizon and Sparse Hierarchical Reinforcement LearningSeungjae Lee, Jigang Kim, Inkyu Jang, H. Jin KimNeurIPS 2022 · 33 citations
- Automating the Refinement of Reinforcement Learning SpecificationsTanmay Ambadkar, Djordje Zikelic, Abhinav VermaICLR 2026
