Ground-Compose-Reinforce: Grounding Language in Agentic Behaviours using Limited Data
Andrew C. Li, Toryn Q. Klassen, Andrew Wang, Parand A. Alamdari, Sheila A. McIlraith
Abstract
Grounding language in perception and action is a key challenge when building situated agents that can interact with humans, or other agents, via language. In the past, addressing this challenge has required manually designing the language grounding or curating massive datasets that associate language with the environment. We propose Ground-Compose-Reinforce, an end-to-end, neurosymbolic framework for training RL agents directly from high-level task specifications--without manually designed reward functions or other domain-specific oracles, and without massive datasets. These task specifications take the form of Reward Machines, automata-based representations that capture high-level task structure and are in some cases autoformalizable from natural language. Critically, we show that Reward Machines can be grounded using limited data by exploiting compositionality. Experiments in a custom Meta-World domain with only 350 labelled pretraining trajectories show that our framework faithfully elicits complex behaviours from high-level specifications--including behaviours that never appear in pretraining--while non-compositional approaches fail.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 99dc2b9d-d826-4010-82ab-f2e0ea0647c8Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on24
- Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language SupervisionAlec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh et al.ICML 2021 · 47,906 citations
- Video PreTraining (VPT): Learning to Act by Watching Unlabeled Online VideosBowen Baker, Ilge Akkaya, Peter Zhokhov, Joost Huizinga et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 458 citations
- LIV: Language-Image Representations and Rewards for Robotic ControlYecheng Jason Ma, Vikash Kumar, Amy Zhang, Osbert Bastani et al.ICML 2023 · 212 citations
- Mildly Conservative Q-Learning for Offline Reinforcement LearningJiafei Lyu, Xiaoteng Ma, Xiu Li, Zongqing LuNeurIPS 2022 · 173 citations
- Chain of Thoughtlessness? An Analysis of CoT in PlanningKaya Stechly, Karthik Valmeekam, Subbarao KambhampatiNeurIPS 2024 · 156 citations
Related papers
- ARM-FM: Automated Reward Machines via Foundation Models for Compositional Reinforcement LearningRoger Creus Castanyer, Faisal Mohamed, Pablo Samuel Castro, Cyrus Neary et al.ICLR 2026 · 6 citations
- Text2Reward: Reward Shaping with Language Models for Reinforcement LearningTianbao Xie, Siheng Zhao, Chen Henry Wu, Yitao Liu et al.ICLR 2024 · 142 citations
- RLZero: Direct Policy Inference from Language Without In-Domain SupervisionHarshit Sikchi, Siddhant Agarwal, Pranaya Jajoo, Samyak Parajuli et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 8 citations
- Reward Machines for Deep RL in Noisy and Uncertain EnvironmentsAndrew C. Li, Zizhao Chen, Toryn Q. Klassen, Pashootan Vaezipoor et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 19 citations
- Neurosymbolic Grounding for Compositional World ModelsAtharva Sehgal, Arya Grayeli, Jennifer J. Sun, Swarat ChaudhuriICLR 2024 · 15 citations
