Automaton Constrained Q-Learning
Anastasios Manganaris, Vittorio Giammarino, Ahmed H. Qureshi
Abstract
Real-world robotic tasks often require agents to achieve sequences of goals while respecting time-varying safety constraints. However, standard Reinforcement Learning (RL) paradigms are fundamentally limited in these settings. A natural approach to these problems is to combine RL with Linear-time Temporal Logic (LTL), a formal language for specifying complex, temporally extended tasks and safety constraints. Yet, existing RL methods for LTL objectives exhibit poor empirical performance in complex and continuous environments. As a result, no scalable methods support both temporally ordered goals and safety simultaneously, making them ill-suited for realistic robotics scenarios. We propose Automaton Constrained Q-Learning (ACQL), an algorithm that addresses this gap by combining goal-conditioned value learning with automaton-guided reinforcement. ACQL supports most LTL task specifications and leverages their automaton representation to explicitly encode stage-wise goal progression and both stationary and non-stationary safety constraints. We show that ACQL outperforms existing methods across a range of continuous control tasks, including cases where prior methods fail to satisfy either goal-reaching or safety constraints. We further validate its real-world applicability by deploying ACQL on a 6-DOF robotic arm performing a goal-reaching task in a cluttered, cabinet-like space with safety constraints. Our results demonstrate that ACQL is a robust and scalable solution for learning robotic behaviors according to rich temporal specifications.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Builds on12
- Responsive Safety in Reinforcement Learning by PID Lagrangian MethodsAdam Stooke, Joshua Achiam, Pieter AbbeelICML 2020 · 403 citations
- IPO: Interior-Point Policy Optimization under ConstraintsYongshuai Liu, Jiaxin Ding, Xin LiuAAAI 2020 · 231 citations
- Compositional Reinforcement Learning from Logical SpecificationsKishor Jothimurugan, Suguman Bansal, Osbert Bastani, Rajeev AlurNeurIPS 2021 · 112 citations
- LTL2Action: Generalizing LTL Instructions for Multi-Task RLPashootan Vaezipoor, Andrew C. Li, Rodrigo Toro Icarte, Sheila A. McIlraithICML 2021 · 106 citations
- Reachability Constrained Reinforcement LearningDongjie Yu, Haitong Ma, Sheng-bo Li, Jianyu ChenICML 2022 · 90 citations
Related papers
- Accelerated Learning with Linear Temporal Logic using Differentiable SimulationAlper Kamil Bozkurt, Calin Belta, Ming C. LinICLR 2026 · 2 citations
- DeepLTL: Learning to Efficiently Satisfy Complex LTL Specifications for Multi-Task RLMathias Jackermeier, Alessandro AbateICLR 2025
- Instructing Goal-Conditioned Reinforcement Learning Agents with Temporal Logic ObjectivesWenjie Qiu, Wensen Mao, He ZhuNeurIPS 2023 · 44 citations
- One Subgoal at a Time: Zero-Shot Generalization to Arbitrary Linear Temporal Logic Requirements in Multi-Task Reinforcement LearningZijian Guo, Ilker Isik, H. M. Sabbir Ahmad, Wenchao LiNeurIPS 2025 · 13 citations
- Temporal Logic Specification-Conditioned Decision Transformer for Offline Safe Reinforcement LearningZijian Guo, Weichao Zhou, Wenchao LiICML 2024 · 7 citations
