Decomposition-Based Optimal Bounds for Privacy Amplification via Shuffling
Pengcheng Su, Haibo Cheng, Ping Wang
Abstract
Shuffling has been shown to amplify differential privacy guarantees, enabling a more favorable privacy-utility trade-off. To characterize and compute this amplification, two fundamental analytical frameworks have been proposed: the privacy blanket by Balle et al. (CRYPTO 2019) and the clone--including both the standard and stronger variant--by Feldman et al. (FOCS 2021, SODA 2023). These frameworks share a common foundation: decomposing local randomizers into structured components for analysis. In this work, we introduce a unified analytical framework--the general clone paradigm--which subsumes all possible decompositions, with the clone and blanket decompositions arising as special cases. Within this framework, we identify the optimal decomposition, which is precisely the one used by the privacy blanket. Moreover, we develop a simple and efficient algorithm based on the Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) to compute optimal privacy amplification bounds. Experimental results show that our computed upper bounds nearly match the lower bounds, demonstrating the tightness of our method. Building on this method, we also derive optimal amplification bounds for both joint and parallel compositions of LDP mechanisms in the shuffle model.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Builds on11
- Locally Differentially Private Protocols for Frequency EstimationTianhao Wang, Jeremiah Blocki, Ninghui Li, Somesh JhaUSENIX Security 2017 · 629 citations
- Privacy Amplification via Random Check-InsBorja Balle, Peter Kairouz, Brendan McMahan, Om Dipakbhai Thakkar et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 86 citations
- Hiding Among the Clones: A Simple and Nearly Optimal Analysis of Privacy Amplification by ShufflingVitaly Feldman, Audra McMillan, Kunal TalwarFOCS 2021 · 76 citations
- Private Counting from Anonymous Messages: Near-Optimal Accuracy with Vanishing Communication OverheadBadih Ghazi, Ravi Kumar, Pasin Manurangsi, Rasmus PaghICML 2020 · 59 citations
- Differentially Private Histograms in the Shuffle Model from Fake UsersAlbert Cheu, Maxim ZhilyaevS&P 2022 · 40 citations
Related papers
- Privacy Amplification via Shuffling: Unified, Simplified, and TightenedShaowei Wang, Yun Peng, Jin Li, Zikai Wen et al.VLDB 2024 · 15 citations
- A Generalized Shuffle Framework for Privacy Amplification: Strengthening Privacy Guarantees and Enhancing UtilityE. Chen, Yang Cao, Yifei GeAAAI 2024 · 16 citations
- Renyi Differential Privacy of The Subsampled Shuffle Model In Distributed LearningAntonious M. Girgis, Deepesh Data, Suhas N. DiggaviNeurIPS 2021 · 28 citations
- Stronger Privacy Amplification by Shuffling for Renyi and Approximate Differential PrivacyVitaly Feldman, Audra McMillan, Kunal TalwarSODA 2023 · 23 citations
- Echo of Neighbors: Privacy Amplification for Personalized Private Federated Learning with Shuffle ModelYixuan Liu, Suyun Zhao, Li Xiong, Yuhan Liu et al.AAAI 2023 · 18 citations
