Private Counting from Anonymous Messages: Near-Optimal Accuracy with Vanishing Communication Overhead
Badih Ghazi, Ravi Kumar, Pasin Manurangsi, Rasmus Pagh
Abstract
Differential privacy (DP) is a formal notion for quantifying the privacy loss of algorithms. Algorithms in the central model of DP achieve high accuracy but make the strongest trust assumptions whereas those in the local DP model make the weakest trust assumptions but incur substantial accuracy loss. The shuffled DP model (Bittau et al., 2017; Erlingsson et al., 2019; Cheu et al., 2019) has recently emerged as a feasible middle ground between the central and local models, providing stronger trust assumptions than the former while promising higher accuracies than the latter. In this paper, we obtain practical communication-efficient algorithms in the shuffled DP model for two basic aggregation primitives used in machine learning: 1) binary summation, and 2) histograms over a moderate number of buckets. Our algorithms achieve accuracy that is arbitrarily close to that of central DP algorithms with an expected communication per user essentially matching what is needed without any privacy constraints! We demonstrate the practicality of our algorithms by experimentally comparing their performance to several widely-used protocols such as Randomized Response (Warner, 1965) and RAPPOR (Erlingsson et al., 2014).
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext cdf3b4a8-0918-473c-921b-48e3b853b418Cited by top-tier papers23
- The Distributed Discrete Gaussian Mechanism for Federated Learning with Secure AggregationPeter Kairouz, Ziyu Liu, Thomas SteinkeICML 2021 · 291 citations
- The Fundamental Price of Secure Aggregation in Differentially Private Federated LearningWei-Ning Chen, Christopher A. Choquette-Choo, Peter Kairouz, Ananda Theertha SureshICML 2022 · 82 citations
- Differentially Private Aggregation in the Shuffle Model: Almost Central Accuracy in Almost a Single MessageBadih Ghazi, Ravi Kumar, Pasin Manurangsi, Rasmus Pagh et al.ICML 2021 · 45 citations
- User-Level Differentially Private Learning via Correlated SamplingBadih Ghazi, Ravi Kumar, Pasin ManurangsiNeurIPS 2021 · 45 citations
- Locally Private k-Means in One RoundAlisa Chang, Badih Ghazi, Ravi Kumar, Pasin ManurangsiICML 2021 · 42 citations
Builds on7
- Private Summation in the Multi-Message Shuffle ModelBorja Balle, James Bell, Adrià Gascón, Kobbi NissimCCS 2020 · 52 citations
- Differentially Private Aggregation in the Shuffle Model: Almost Central Accuracy in Almost a Single MessageBadih Ghazi, Ravi Kumar, Pasin Manurangsi, Rasmus Pagh et al.ICML 2021 · 45 citations
- Private Aggregation from Fewer Anonymous MessagesBadih Ghazi, Pasin Manurangsi, Rasmus Pagh, Ameya VelingkerEUROCRYPT 2020 · 45 citations
- Locally Private k-Means in One RoundAlisa Chang, Badih Ghazi, Ravi Kumar, Pasin ManurangsiICML 2021 · 42 citations
- Differentially Private Histograms in the Shuffle Model from Fake UsersAlbert Cheu, Maxim ZhilyaevS&P 2022 · 40 citations
Related papers
- Learning from End User Data with Shuffled Differential Privacy over Kernel DensitiesTal WagnerICLR 2025
- Shuffle Private Stochastic Convex OptimizationAlbert Cheu, Matthew Joseph, Jieming Mao, Binghui PengICLR 2022 · 29 citations
- Locally Differentially Private Protocols for Frequency EstimationTianhao Wang, Jeremiah Blocki, Ninghui Li, Somesh JhaUSENIX Security 2017 · 629 citations
- Samplable Anonymous Aggregation for Private Federated Data AnalysisKunal Talwar, Shan Wang, Audra McMillan, Vitaly Feldman et al.CCS 2024 · 6 citations
- RM2: Answer Counting Queries Efficiently under Shuffle Differential PrivacyQiyao Luo, Jianzhe Yu, Wei Dong, Quanqing Xu et al.SIGMOD 2025 · 3 citations
