Differentially Private Histograms in the Shuffle Model from Fake Users
Albert Cheu, Maxim Zhilyaev
Abstract
There has been much recent work in the shuffle model of differential privacy, particularly for approximate d-bin histograms. While these protocols achieve low error, the number of messages sent by each user—the message complexity—has so far scaled with d or the privacy parameters. The message complexity is an informative predictor of a shuffle protocol’s resource consumption. We present a protocol whose message complexity is two when there are sufficiently many users. The protocol essentially pairs each row in the dataset with a fake row and performs a simple randomization on all rows. We show that the error introduced by the protocol is small, using rigorous analysis as well as experiments on real-world data. We also prove that corrupt users have a relatively low impact on our protocol’s estimates.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 2d454b49-875b-4190-b1bc-cf89f5039988Cited by top-tier papers18
- Private Counting from Anonymous Messages: Near-Optimal Accuracy with Vanishing Communication OverheadBadih Ghazi, Ravi Kumar, Pasin Manurangsi, Rasmus PaghICML 2020 · 59 citations
- Differentially Private Aggregation in the Shuffle Model: Almost Central Accuracy in Almost a Single MessageBadih Ghazi, Ravi Kumar, Pasin Manurangsi, Rasmus Pagh et al.ICML 2021 · 45 citations
- User-Level Differentially Private Learning via Correlated SamplingBadih Ghazi, Ravi Kumar, Pasin ManurangsiNeurIPS 2021 · 45 citations
- Distributed, Private, Sparse Histograms in the Two-Server ModelJames Bell, Adrià Gascón, Badih Ghazi, Ravi Kumar et al.CCS 2022 · 19 citations
- Privacy Amplification via Shuffling: Unified, Simplified, and TightenedShaowei Wang, Yun Peng, Jin Li, Zikai Wen et al.VLDB 2024 · 15 citations
Builds on4
- Manipulation Attacks in Local Differential PrivacyAlbert Cheu, Adam D. Smith, Jonathan R. UllmanS&P 2021 · 122 citations
- Data Poisoning Attacks to Local Differential Privacy ProtocolsXiaoyu Cao, Jinyuan Jia, Neil Zhenqiang GongUSENIX Security 2021 · 100 citations
- Hiding Among the Clones: A Simple and Nearly Optimal Analysis of Privacy Amplification by ShufflingVitaly Feldman, Audra McMillan, Kunal TalwarFOCS 2021 · 76 citations
- Private Counting from Anonymous Messages: Near-Optimal Accuracy with Vanishing Communication OverheadBadih Ghazi, Ravi Kumar, Pasin Manurangsi, Rasmus PaghICML 2020 · 59 citations
Related papers
- High-Accuracy, Poisoning-Resilient Frequency Estimation in the Shuffle ModelShaoqiang Wu, Jingyu Jia, Yikuan Zhu, Xinhao Li et al.USENIX Security 2026
- On the Power of Multiple Anonymous Messages: Frequency Estimation and Selection in the Shuffle Model of Differential PrivacyBadih Ghazi, Noah Golowich, Ravi Kumar, Rasmus Pagh et al.EUROCRYPT 2021 · 34 citations
- Private Vector Mean Estimation in the Shuffle Model: Optimal Rates Require Many MessagesHilal Asi, Vitaly Feldman, Jelani Nelson, Huy L. Nguyen et al.ICML 2024 · 8 citations
- RM2: Answer Counting Queries Efficiently under Shuffle Differential PrivacyQiyao Luo, Jianzhe Yu, Wei Dong, Quanqing Xu et al.SIGMOD 2025 · 3 citations
- Private Summation in the Multi-Message Shuffle ModelBorja Balle, James Bell, Adrià Gascón, Kobbi NissimCCS 2020 · 52 citations
