Privacy Amplification via Shuffling: Unified, Simplified, and Tightened
Shaowei Wang, Yun Peng, Jin Li, Zikai Wen, Zhipeng Li, Shiyu Yu, Di Wang, Wei Yang
Abstract
The shuffle model of differential privacy provides promising privacy-utility balances in decentralized, privacy-preserving data analysis. However, the current analyses of privacy amplification via shuffling lack both tightness and generality. To address this issue, we propose the variation-ratio reduction as a comprehensive framework for privacy amplification in both single-message and multi-message shuffle protocols. It leverages two new parameterizations: the total variation bounds of local messages and the probability ratio bounds of blanket messages, to determine indistinguishability levels. Our theoretical results demonstrate that our framework provides tighter bounds, especially for local randomizers with extremal probability design, where our bounds are exactly tight. Additionally, variation-ratio reduction complements parallel composition in the shuffle model, yielding enhanced privacy accounting for popular sampling-based randomizers employed in statistical queries (e.g., range queries, marginal queries, and frequent itemset mining). Empirical findings demonstrate that our numerical amplification bounds surpass existing ones, conserving up to 30% of the budget for single-message protocols, 75% for multi-message ones, and a striking 75%-95% for parallel composition. Our bounds also result in a remarkably efficient Õ ( n ) algorithm that numerically amplifies privacy in less than 10 seconds for n = 10 8 users.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 10deb2a3-61ac-42d1-b5ab-ac33c5e6f6acCited by top-tier papers2
- Decomposition-Based Optimal Bounds for Privacy Amplification via ShufflingPengcheng Su, Haibo Cheng, Ping WangS&P 2026 · 4 citations
- Beyond Statistical Estimation: Differentially Private Individual Computation via ShufflingShaowei Wang, Changyu Dong, Xiangfu Song, Jin Li et al.USENIX Security 2025
Builds on24
- Practical Secure Aggregation for Privacy-Preserving Machine LearningKallista A. Bonawitz, Vladimir Ivanov, Ben Kreuter, Antonio Marcedone et al.CCS 2017 · 3,936 citations
- Locally Differentially Private Protocols for Frequency EstimationTianhao Wang, Jeremiah Blocki, Ninghui Li, Somesh JhaUSENIX Security 2017 · 629 citations
- Heavy Hitter Estimation over Set-Valued Data with Local Differential PrivacyZhan Qin, Yin Yang, Ting Yu, Issa Khalil et al.CCS 2016 · 344 citations
- Locally Differentially Private Frequent Itemset MiningTianhao Wang, Ninghui Li, Somesh JhaS&P 2018 · 196 citations
- CALM: Consistent Adaptive Local Marginal for Marginal Release under Local Differential PrivacyZhikun Zhang, Tianhao Wang, Ninghui Li, Shibo He et al.CCS 2018 · 130 citations
Related papers
- Hiding Among the Clones: A Simple and Nearly Optimal Analysis of Privacy Amplification by ShufflingVitaly Feldman, Audra McMillan, Kunal TalwarFOCS 2021 · 76 citations
- A Generalized Shuffle Framework for Privacy Amplification: Strengthening Privacy Guarantees and Enhancing UtilityE. Chen, Yang Cao, Yifei GeAAAI 2024 · 16 citations
- Amplification by Shuffling without ShufflingBorja Balle, James Bell, Adrià GascónCCS 2023
- RM2: Answer Counting Queries Efficiently under Shuffle Differential PrivacyQiyao Luo, Jianzhe Yu, Wei Dong, Quanqing Xu et al.SIGMOD 2025 · 3 citations
- Stronger Privacy Amplification by Shuffling for Renyi and Approximate Differential PrivacyVitaly Feldman, Audra McMillan, Kunal TalwarSODA 2023 · 23 citations
