Privacy Amplification via Random Check-Ins
Borja Balle, Peter Kairouz, Brendan McMahan, Om Dipakbhai Thakkar, Abhradeep Thakurta
Abstract
Differentially Private Stochastic Gradient Descent (DP-SGD) forms a fundamental building block in many applications for learning over sensitive data. Two standard approaches, privacy amplification by subsampling, and privacy amplification by shuffling, permit adding lower noise in DP-SGD than via naïve schemes. A key assumption in both these approaches is that the elements in the data set can be uniformly sampled, or be uniformly permuted -- constraints that may become prohibitive when the data is processed in a decentralized or distributed fashion. In this paper, we focus on conducting iterative methods like DP-SGD in the setting of federated learning (FL) wherein the data is distributed among many devices (clients). Our main contribution is the random check-in distributed protocol, which crucially relies only on randomized participation decisions made locally and independently by each client. It has privacy/accuracy trade-offs similar to privacy amplification by subsampling/shuffling. However, our method does not require server-initiated communication, or even knowledge of the population size. To our knowledge, this is the first privacy amplification tailored for a distributed learning framework, and it may have broader applicability beyond FL. Along the way, we extend privacy amplification by shuffling to incorporate -DP local randomizers, and exponentially improve its guarantees. In practical regimes, this improvement allows for similar privacy and utility using data from an order of magnitude fewer users.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers15
- Hiding Among the Clones: A Simple and Nearly Optimal Analysis of Privacy Amplification by ShufflingVitaly Feldman, Audra McMillan, Kunal TalwarFOCS 2021 · 76 citations
- (Amplified) Banded Matrix Factorization: A unified approach to private trainingChristopher A. Choquette-Choo, Arun Ganesh, Ryan McKenna, H. Brendan McMahan et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 67 citations
- Not All Features Are Equal: Discovering Essential Features for Preserving Prediction PrivacyFatemehsadat Mireshghallah, Mohammadkazem Taram, Ali Jalali, Ahmed Taha Elthakeb et al.WWW 2021 · 59 citations
- Fast and Memory Efficient Differentially Private-SGD via JL ProjectionsZhiqi Bu, Sivakanth Gopi, Janardhan Kulkarni, Yin Tat Lee et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 49 citations
- On the Convergence of Federated Averaging with Cyclic Client ParticipationYae Jee Cho, Pranay Sharma, Gauri Joshi, Zheng Xu et al.ICML 2023 · 47 citations
Builds on3
- Deep Learning with Differential PrivacyMartín Abadi, Andy Chu, Ian J. Goodfellow, H. Brendan McMahan et al.CCS 2016 · 7,620 citations
- Differentially Private Learning with Adaptive ClippingGalen Andrew, Om Thakkar, Brendan McMahan, Swaroop RamaswamyNeurIPS 2021 · 425 citations
- Is Interaction Necessary for Distributed Private Learning?Adam D. Smith, Abhradeep Thakurta, Jalaj UpadhyayS&P 2017 · 159 citations
Related papers
- Renyi Differential Privacy of The Subsampled Shuffle Model In Distributed LearningAntonious M. Girgis, Deepesh Data, Suhas N. DiggaviNeurIPS 2021 · 28 citations
- Practical and Private (Deep) Learning Without Sampling or ShufflingPeter Kairouz, Brendan McMahan, Shuang Song, Om Thakkar et al.ICML 2021 · 239 citations
- FLAME: Differentially Private Federated Learning in the Shuffle ModelRuixuan Liu, Yang Cao, Hong Chen, Ruoyang Guo et al.AAAI 2021 · 117 citations
- From Noisy Fixed-Point Iterations to Private ADMM for Centralized and Federated LearningEdwige Cyffers, Aurélien Bellet, Debabrota BasuICML 2023 · 6 citations
- Leveraging Randomness in Model and Data Partitioning for Privacy AmplificationAndy Dong, Wei-Ning Chen, Ayfer ÖzgürICML 2025
