Differentially Private Learning with Adaptive Clipping
Galen Andrew, Om Thakkar, Brendan McMahan, Swaroop Ramaswamy
Abstract
Existing approaches for training neural networks with user-level differential privacy (e.g., DP Federated Averaging) in federated learning (FL) settings involve bounding the contribution of each user's model update by clipping it to some constant value. However there is no good a priori setting of the clipping norm across tasks and learning settings: the update norm distribution depends on the model architecture and loss, the amount of data on each device, the client learning rate, and possibly various other parameters. We propose a method wherein instead of a fixed clipping norm, one clips to a value at a specified quantile of the update norm distribution, where the value at the quantile is itself estimated online, with differential privacy. The method tracks the quantile closely, uses a negligible amount of privacy budget, is compatible with other federated learning technologies such as compression and secure aggregation, and has a straightforward joint DP analysis with DP-FedAvg. Experiments demonstrate that adaptive clipping to the median update norm works well across a range of realistic federated learning tasks, sometimes outperforming even the best fixed clip chosen in hindsight, and without the need to tune any clipping hyperparameter.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext db89edc6-6802-47bb-9a22-888b5b6ebc51Cited by top-tier papers100
- Differentially Private Learning Needs Better Features (or Much More Data)Florian Tramèr, Dan BonehICLR 2021 · 325 citations
- The Distributed Discrete Gaussian Mechanism for Federated Learning with Secure AggregationPeter Kairouz, Ziyu Liu, Thomas SteinkeICML 2021 · 291 citations
- Understanding Gradient Clipping in Private SGD: A Geometric PerspectiveXiangyi Chen, Zhiwei Steven Wu, Mingyi HongNeurIPS 2020 · 254 citations
- Practical and Private (Deep) Learning Without Sampling or ShufflingPeter Kairouz, Brendan McMahan, Shuang Song, Om Thakkar et al.ICML 2021 · 239 citations
- Robust Federated Learning: The Case of Affine Distribution ShiftsAmirhossein Reisizadeh, Farzan Farnia, Ramtin Pedarsani, Ali JadbabaieNeurIPS 2020 · 196 citations
Builds on4
- Deep Learning with Differential PrivacyMartín Abadi, Andy Chu, Ian J. Goodfellow, H. Brendan McMahan et al.CCS 2016 · 7,620 citations
- Membership Inference Attacks Against Machine Learning ModelsReza Shokri, Marco Stronati, Congzheng Song, Vitaly ShmatikovS&P 2017 · 5,137 citations
- Exploiting Unintended Feature Leakage in Collaborative LearningLuca Melis, Congzheng Song, Emiliano De Cristofaro, Vitaly ShmatikovS&P 2019 · 1,736 citations
- Towards Practical Differentially Private Convex OptimizationRoger Iyengar, Joseph P. Near, Dawn Song, Om Thakkar et al.S&P 2019 · 201 citations
Related papers
- Understanding Clipping for Federated Learning: Convergence and Client-Level Differential PrivacyXinwei Zhang, Xiangyi Chen, Mingyi Hong, Steven Wu et al.ICML 2022 · 134 citations
- An improved analysis of per-sample and per-update clipping in federated learningBo Li, Xiaowen Jiang, Mikkel N. Schmidt, Tommy Sonne Alstrøm et al.ICLR 2024 · 9 citations
- Private Federated Learning with Autotuned CompressionEnayat Ullah, Christopher A. Choquette-Choo, Peter Kairouz, Sewoong OhICML 2023 · 8 citations
- Differentially Private Federated Learning with Local Regularization and SparsificationAnda Cheng, Peisong Wang, Xi Sheryl Zhang, Jian ChengCVPR 2022 · 104 citations
- Uldp-FL: Federated Learning with Across Silo User-Level Differential PrivacyFumiyuki Kato, Li Xiong, Shun Takagi, Yang Cao et al.VLDB 2024 · 14 citations
