Learning to Re-rank with Constrained Meta-Optimal Transport
Andrés Hoyos Idrobo
Abstract
Many re-ranking strategies in search systems rely on stochastic ranking policies, encoded as Doubly-Stochastic (DS) matrices, that satisfy desired ranking constraints in expectation, e.g., Fairness of Exposure (FOE). These strategies are generally two-stage pipelines: i) an offline re-ranking policy construction step and ii) an online sampling of rankings step. Building a re-ranking policy requires repeatedly solving a constrained optimization problem, one for each issued query. Thus, it is necessary to recompute the optimization procedure for any new/unseen query. Regarding sampling, the Birkhoff-von-Neumann decomposition (BvND) is the favored approach to draw rankings from any DS-based policy. Nonetheless, the BvND is too costly to compute online. Hence, the BvND as a sampling solution is memory-consuming as it can grow as O (𝑁 𝑛 2 ) for 𝑁 queries and 𝑛 documents.
This paper proposes a novel, fast, lightweight way to predict fair stochastic re-ranking policies: Constrained Meta-Optimal Transport (CoMOT). This method fits a neural network shared across queries like a learning-to-rank system. We also introduce Gumbel-Matching Sampling (GumMS), an online sampling approach from DS-based policies. Our proposed pipeline, CoMOT + GumMS, only needs to store the parameters of a single model, and it can generalize to unseen queries. We empirically evaluated our pipeline on the TREC 2019 and 2020 datasets under FOE constraints. Our experiments show that CoMOT rapidly predicts fair re-ranking policies on held-out data, with a speed-up proportional to the average number of documents per query. It also displays fairness and ranking performance similar to the original optimization-based policy. Furthermore, we empirically validate the effectiveness of GumMS to approximate DS-based policies in expectation. Together, our methods are an important step in learning-to-predict solutions to optimization problems in information retrieval.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 652def01-c763-4eba-bf8f-096bbb060d0fCited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on10
- Computationally Efficient Optimization of Plackett-Luce Ranking Models for Relevance and FairnessHarrie OosterhuisSIGIR 2021 · 68 citations
- Fairness in Ranking under UncertaintyAshudeep Singh, David Kempe, Thorsten JoachimsNeurIPS 2021 · 62 citations
- Joint Multisided Exposure Fairness for RecommendationHaolun Wu, Bhaskar Mitra, Chen Ma, Fernando Diaz et al.SIGIR 2022 · 48 citations
- Are Neural Rankers still Outperformed by Gradient Boosted Decision Trees?Zhen Qin, Le Yan, Honglei Zhuang, Yi Tay et al.ICLR 2021 · 41 citations
- Policy-Gradient Training of Fair and Unbiased Ranking FunctionsHimank Yadav, Zhengxiao Du, Thorsten JoachimsSIGIR 2021 · 34 citations
Related papers
- Querywise Fair Learning to Rank through Multi-Objective OptimizationDebabrata Mahapatra, Chaosheng Dong, Michinari MommaKDD 2023 · 5 citations
- Fairness-Aware Exposure Allocation via Adaptive RerankingThomas Jänich, Graham McDonald, Iadh OunisSIGIR 2024 · 14 citations
- Pareto-Optimal Fairness-Utility Amortizations in Rankings with a DBN Exposure ModelTill Kletti, Jean-Michel Renders, Patrick LoiseauSIGIR 2022 · 4 citations
- Fairness of Exposure in Light of Incomplete Exposure EstimationMaria Heuss, Fatemeh Sarvi, Maarten de RijkeSIGIR 2022 · 21 citations
- Gumbel Reranking: Differentiable End-to-End Reranker OptimizationSiyuan Huang, Zhiyuan Ma, Jintao Du, Changhua Meng et al.ACL 2025
