Fairness-Aware Exposure Allocation via Adaptive Reranking
Thomas Jänich, Graham McDonald, Iadh Ounis
Abstract
In the first stage of a re-ranking pipeline, an inexpensive ranking model is typically deployed to retrieve a set of documents that are highly likely to be relevant to the user's query. The retrieved documents are then re-ranked by a more effective but expensive ranking model, e.g., a deep neural ranker such as BERT. However, in such a standard pipeline, no new documents are typically discovered after the first stage retrieval. Hence, the amount of exposure that a particular group of documents - e.g., documents from a particular demographic category - can receive is limited by the number of documents that are retrieved in the first stage retrieval. Indeed, if too few documents from a group are retrieved in the first stage retrieval, ensuring that the group receives a fair amount of exposure to the user may become infeasible. Therefore, it is useful to identify more documents from underrepresented groups that are potentially relevant to the query during the re-ranking stage. In this work, we investigate how deploying adaptive re-ranking, which enables the discovery of additional potentially relevant documents in the re-ranking stage, can improve the exposure that a given group of documents receives in the final ranking. We propose six adaptive re-ranking policies that can discover documents from underrepresented groups to increase the disadvantaged groups' exposure in the final ranking. Our experiments on the TREC 2021 and 2022 Fair Ranking Track test collections show that our policies consistently improve the fairness of the exposure distribution in the final ranking, compared to standard adaptive re-ranking approaches, resulting in increases of up to 13% in Attention Weighted Ranked Fairness (AWRF). Moreover, our best performing policy, Policy 6, consistently maintains and frequently increases the utility of the search results in terms of nDCG.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 7b8adc63-32e0-4dd7-b3fd-59a0ccb708eaCited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on6
- ELECTRA: Pre-training Text Encoders as Discriminators Rather Than GeneratorsKevin Clark, Minh-Thang Luong, Quoc V. Le, Christopher D. ManningICLR 2020 · 541 citations
- Efficiently Teaching an Effective Dense Retriever with Balanced Topic Aware SamplingSebastian Hofstätter, Sheng-Chieh Lin, Jheng-Hong Yang, Jimmy Lin et al.SIGIR 2021 · 297 citations
- Controlling Fairness and Bias in Dynamic Learning-to-RankMarco Morik, Ashudeep Singh, Jessica Hong, Thorsten JoachimsSIGIR 2020 · 205 citations
- Policy-Aware Unbiased Learning to Rank for Top-k RankingsHarrie Oosterhuis, Maarten de RijkeSIGIR 2020 · 60 citations
- Joint Multisided Exposure Fairness for RecommendationHaolun Wu, Bhaskar Mitra, Chen Ma, Fernando Diaz et al.SIGIR 2022 · 48 citations
Related papers
- Societal Biases in Retrieved Contents: Measurement Framework and Adversarial Mitigation of BERT RankersNavid Rekabsaz, Simone Kopeinik, Markus SchedlSIGIR 2021 · 55 citations
- FairSync: Ensuring Amortized Group Exposure in Distributed Recommendation RetrievalChen Xu, Jun Xu, Yiming Ding, Xiao Zhang et al.WWW 2024 · 14 citations
- Post-hoc Provider Fairness Adaptation via Hierarchical Exposure AlignmentJingzhi Li, Zhiyong Cheng, Richang Hong, Meng WangSIGIR 2026 · 1 citation
- Querywise Fair Learning to Rank through Multi-Objective OptimizationDebabrata Mahapatra, Chaosheng Dong, Michinari MommaKDD 2023 · 5 citations
- Individually Fair RankingsAmanda Bower, Hamid Eftekhari, Mikhail Yurochkin, Yuekai SunICLR 2021 · 4 citations
