Computationally Efficient Optimization of Plackett-Luce Ranking Models for Relevance and Fairness
Harrie Oosterhuis
Abstract
Recent work has proposed stochastic Plackett-Luce (PL) ranking models as a robust choice for optimizing relevance and fairness metrics. Unlike their deterministic counterparts that require heuristic optimization algorithms, PL models are fully differentiable. Theoretically, they can be used to optimize ranking metrics via stochastic gradient descent. However, in practice, the computation of the gradient is infeasible because it requires one to iterate over all possible permutations of items. Consequently, actual applications rely on approximating the gradient via sampling techniques.
In this paper, we introduce a novel algorithm: PL-Rank, that estimates the gradient of a PL ranking model w.r.t. both relevance and fairness metrics. Unlike existing approaches that are based on policy gradients, PL-Rank makes use of the specific structure of PL models and ranking metrics. Our experimental analysis shows that PL-Rank has a greater sample-efficiency and is computationally less costly than existing policy gradients, resulting in faster convergence at higher performance. PL-Rank further enables the industry to apply PL models for more relevant and fairer real-world ranking systems.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 36d15e88-a656-40dd-b4b5-a7fe5a52a5e3Cited by top-tier papers18
- Joint Multisided Exposure Fairness for RecommendationHaolun Wu, Bhaskar Mitra, Chen Ma, Fernando Diaz et al.SIGIR 2022 · 48 citations
- Set-to-Sequence Ranking-Based Concept-Aware Learning Path RecommendationXianyu Chen, Jian Shen, Wei Xia, Jiarui Jin et al.AAAI 2023 · 25 citations
- Fair Ranking as Fair Division: Impact-Based Individual Fairness in RankingYuta Saito, Thorsten JoachimsKDD 2022 · 23 citations
- Safe Deployment for Counterfactual Learning to Rank with Exposure-Based Risk MinimizationShashank Gupta, Harrie Oosterhuis, Maarten de RijkeSIGIR 2023 · 17 citations
- Probabilistic Permutation Graph Search: Black-Box Optimization for Fairness in RankingAli Vardasbi, Fatemeh Sarvi, Maarten de RijkeSIGIR 2022 · 9 citations
Builds on1
Related papers
- Optimizing Learning-to-Rank Models for Ex-Post Fair RelevanceSruthi Gorantla, Eshaan Bhansali, Amit Deshpande, Anand LouisSIGIR 2024 · 1 citation
- Querywise Fair Learning to Rank through Multi-Objective OptimizationDebabrata Mahapatra, Chaosheng Dong, Michinari MommaKDD 2023 · 5 citations
- Efficient and Accurate Learning of Mixtures of Plackett-Luce ModelsDuc Nguyen, Anderson Y. ZhangAAAI 2023 · 8 citations
- Estimation of Fair Ranking Metrics with Incomplete JudgmentsÖmer Kirnap, Fernando Diaz, Asia Biega, Michael D. Ekstrand et al.WWW 2021 · 40 citations
- Pairwise Fairness for Ranking and RegressionHarikrishna Narasimhan, Andrew Cotter, Maya R. Gupta, Serena Lutong WangAAAI 2020 · 125 citations
