Lune

WWW2021Top-tier venue

Estimation of Fair Ranking Metrics with Incomplete Judgments

Ömer Kirnap, Fernando Diaz, Asia Biega, Michael D. Ekstrand, Ben Carterette, Emine Yilmaz

2021Year
40Citations
4Top-tier citations

Abstract

There is increasing attention to evaluating the fairness of search system ranking decisions. These metrics often consider the membership of items to particular groups, often identified using protected attributes such as gender or ethnicity. To date, these metrics typically assume the availability and completeness of protected attribute labels of items. However, the protected attributes of individuals are rarely present, limiting the application of fair ranking metrics in large scale systems. In order to address this problem, we propose a sampling strategy and estimation technique for four fair ranking metrics. We formulate a robust and unbiased estimator which can operate even with very limited number of labeled items. We evaluate our approach using both simulated and real world data. Our experimental results demonstrate that our method can estimate this family of fair ranking metrics and provides a robust, reliable alternative to exhaustive or random data annotation.

Ask about this paper

Your agent reads all of it.

Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.

Questions to start from

Your agent calls

Luneget_paper_fulltext

Ask in Lune

Free to start. No credit card required.

lune papers fulltext 931d1f20-2f4a-4347-8c7f-e7fab637ff37

Cited by top-tier papers4

Ask how each one uses it

Builds on2

Related papers

Dusk over the sea between two cliffs drawn in fine vertical lines