Estimation of Fair Ranking Metrics with Incomplete Judgments
Ömer Kirnap, Fernando Diaz, Asia Biega, Michael D. Ekstrand, Ben Carterette, Emine Yilmaz
Abstract
There is increasing attention to evaluating the fairness of search system ranking decisions. These metrics often consider the membership of items to particular groups, often identified using protected attributes such as gender or ethnicity. To date, these metrics typically assume the availability and completeness of protected attribute labels of items. However, the protected attributes of individuals are rarely present, limiting the application of fair ranking metrics in large scale systems. In order to address this problem, we propose a sampling strategy and estimation technique for four fair ranking metrics. We formulate a robust and unbiased estimator which can operate even with very limited number of labeled items. We evaluate our approach using both simulated and real world data. Our experimental results demonstrate that our method can estimate this family of fair ranking metrics and provides a robust, reliable alternative to exhaustive or random data annotation.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 931d1f20-2f4a-4347-8c7f-e7fab637ff37Cited by top-tier papers4
- CPFair: Personalized Consumer and Producer Fairness Re-ranking for Recommender SystemsMohammadmehdi Naghiaei, Hossein A. Rahmani, Yashar DeldjooSIGIR 2022 · 117 citations
- Fair Ranking with Noisy Protected AttributesAnay Mehrotra, Nisheeth K. VishnoiNeurIPS 2022 · 24 citations
- Re-thinking Knowledge Graph Completion Evaluation from an Information Retrieval PerspectiveYing Zhou, Xuanang Chen, Ben He, Zheng Ye et al.SIGIR 2022 · 13 citations
- Probabilistic Permutation Graph Search: Black-Box Optimization for Fairness in RankingAli Vardasbi, Fatemeh Sarvi, Maarten de RijkeSIGIR 2022 · 9 citations
Builds on2
Related papers
- Measuring Fairness in Ranked Results: An Analytical and Empirical ComparisonAmifa Raj, Michael D. EkstrandSIGIR 2022 · 74 citations
- The Impact of Group Membership Bias on the Quality and Fairness of Exposure in RankingAli Vardasbi, Maarten de Rijke, Fernando Diaz, Mostafa DehghaniSIGIR 2024 · 2 citations
- Detection of Groups with Biased Representation in RankingJinyang Li, Yuval Moskovitch, H. V. JagadishICDE 2023 · 10 citations
- Pairwise Fairness for Ranking and RegressionHarikrishna Narasimhan, Andrew Cotter, Maya R. Gupta, Serena Lutong WangAAAI 2020 · 125 citations
- Multi-Group Proportional Representation in RetrievalAlex Oesterling, Claudio Mayrink Verdun, Alexander Glynn, Carol Xuan Long et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 4 citations
