Fairness of Exposure in Light of Incomplete Exposure Estimation
Maria Heuss, Fatemeh Sarvi, Maarten de Rijke
Abstract
Fairness of exposure is a commonly used notion of fairness for ranking systems. It is based on the idea that all items or item groups should get exposure proportional to the merit of the item or the collective merit of the items in the group. Often, stochastic ranking policies are used to ensure fairness of exposure. Previous work unrealistically assumes that we can reliably estimate the expected exposure for all items in each ranking produced by the stochastic policy. In this work, we discuss how to approach fairness of exposure in cases where the policy contains rankings of which, due to inter-item dependencies, we cannot reliably estimate the exposure distribution. In such cases, we cannot determine whether the policy can be considered fair. % Our contributions in this paper are twofold. First, we define a method called for finding stochastic policies that avoid showing rankings with unknown exposure distribution to the user without having to compromise user utility or item fairness. Second, we extend the study of fairness of exposure to the top-k setting and also assess in this setting. We find that can significantly reduce the number of rankings with unknown exposure distribution without a drop in user utility or fairness compared to existing fair ranking methods, both for full-length and top-k rankings. This is an important first step in developing fair ranking methods for cases where we have incomplete knowledge about the user's behaviour.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 777d64a0-b142-4ff9-bc97-6837f4ddfc85Cited by top-tier papers6
- Fairness-Aware Exposure Allocation via Adaptive RerankingThomas Jänich, Graham McDonald, Iadh OunisSIGIR 2024 · 14 citations
- Probabilistic Permutation Graph Search: Black-Box Optimization for Fairness in RankingAli Vardasbi, Fatemeh Sarvi, Maarten de RijkeSIGIR 2022 · 9 citations
- On the Impact of Outlier Bias on User ClicksFatemeh Sarvi, Ali Vardasbi, Mohammad Aliannejadi, Sebastian Schelter et al.SIGIR 2023 · 6 citations
- Learning to Re-rank with Constrained Meta-Optimal TransportAndrés Hoyos IdroboSIGIR 2023 · 1 citation
- What's in a Query: Polarity-Aware Distribution-Based Fair RankingAparna Balagopalan, Kai Wang, Olawale Salaudeen, Asia Biega et al.WWW 2025 · 1 citation
Builds on4
- Clicks can be Cheating: Counterfactual Recommendation for Mitigating Clickbait IssueWenjie Wang, Fuli Feng, Xiangnan He, Hanwang Zhang et al.SIGIR 2021 · 173 citations
- Fairness in Ranking under UncertaintyAshudeep Singh, David Kempe, Thorsten JoachimsNeurIPS 2021 · 62 citations
- Policy-Gradient Training of Fair and Unbiased Ranking FunctionsHimank Yadav, Zhengxiao Du, Thorsten JoachimsSIGIR 2021 · 34 citations
- Probabilistic Permutation Graph Search: Black-Box Optimization for Fairness in RankingAli Vardasbi, Fatemeh Sarvi, Maarten de RijkeSIGIR 2022 · 9 citations
Related papers
- Pareto-Optimal Fairness-Utility Amortizations in Rankings with a DBN Exposure ModelTill Kletti, Jean-Michel Renders, Patrick LoiseauSIGIR 2022 · 4 citations
- Fair Ranking as Fair Division: Impact-Based Individual Fairness in RankingYuta Saito, Thorsten JoachimsKDD 2022 · 23 citations
- Fairness of Exposure in Stochastic BanditsLequn Wang, Yiwei Bai, Wen Sun, Thorsten JoachimsICML 2021 · 60 citations
- Joint Multisided Exposure Fairness for RecommendationHaolun Wu, Bhaskar Mitra, Chen Ma, Fernando Diaz et al.SIGIR 2022 · 48 citations
- Make Fairness More Fair: Fair Item Utility Estimation and Exposure Re-DistributionJiayin Wang, Weizhi Ma, Jiayu Li, Hongyu Lu et al.KDD 2022 · 20 citations
