Pareto-Optimal Fairness-Utility Amortizations in Rankings with a DBN Exposure Model
Till Kletti, Jean-Michel Renders, Patrick Loiseau
Abstract
In recent years, it has become clear that rankings delivered in many areas need not only be useful to the users but also respect fairness of exposure for the item producers. We consider the problem of finding ranking policies that achieve a Pareto-optimal tradeoff between these two aspects. Several methods were proposed to solve it; for instance a popular one is to use linear programming with a Birkhoff-von Neumann decomposition. These methods, however, are based on a classical Position Based exposure Model (PBM), which assumes independence between the items (hence the exposure only depends on the rank). In many applications, this assumption is unrealistic and the community increasingly moves towards considering other models that include dependences, such as the Dynamic Bayesian Network (DBN) exposure model. For such models, computing (exact) optimal fair ranking policies remains an open question. In this paper, we answer this question by leveraging a new geometrical method based on the so-called expohedron proposed recently for the PBM (Kletti et al., WSDM'22). We lay out the structure of a new geometrical object (the DBN-expohedron), and propose for it a Carathéodory decomposition algorithm of complexity , where n is the number of documents to rank. Such an algorithm enables expressing any feasible expected exposure vector as a distribution over at most n rankings; furthermore we show that we can compute the whole set of Pareto-optimal expected exposure vectors with the same complexity . Our work constitutes the first exact algorithm able to efficiently find a Pareto-optimal distribution of rankings. It is applicable to a broad range of fairness notions, including classical notions of meritocratic and demographic fairness. We empirically evaluate our method on the TREC2020 and MSLR datasets and compare it to several baselines in terms of Pareto-optimality and speed.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 0b519253-2d4b-4fa7-b271-dcf8822fec23Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on3
- Controlling Fairness and Bias in Dynamic Learning-to-RankMarco Morik, Ashudeep Singh, Jessica Hong, Thorsten JoachimsSIGIR 2020 · 205 citations
- Computationally Efficient Optimization of Plackett-Luce Ranking Models for Relevance and FairnessHarrie OosterhuisSIGIR 2021 · 68 citations
- Fairness in Ranking under UncertaintyAshudeep Singh, David Kempe, Thorsten JoachimsNeurIPS 2021 · 62 citations
Related papers
- Fairness of Exposure in Light of Incomplete Exposure EstimationMaria Heuss, Fatemeh Sarvi, Maarten de RijkeSIGIR 2022 · 21 citations
- Fair Ranking as Fair Division: Impact-Based Individual Fairness in RankingYuta Saito, Thorsten JoachimsKDD 2022 · 23 citations
- Contextual bandits with concave rewards, and an application to fair rankingVirginie Do, Elvis Dohmatob, Matteo Pirotta, Alessandro Lazaric et al.ICLR 2023
- Policy-Gradient Training of Fair and Unbiased Ranking FunctionsHimank Yadav, Zhengxiao Du, Thorsten JoachimsSIGIR 2021 · 34 citations
- Querywise Fair Learning to Rank through Multi-Objective OptimizationDebabrata Mahapatra, Chaosheng Dong, Michinari MommaKDD 2023 · 5 citations
