CLAMBER: A Benchmark of Identifying and Clarifying Ambiguous Information Needs in Large Language Models
Tong Zhang, Peixin Qin, Yang Deng, Chen Huang, Wenqiang Lei, Junhong Liu, Dingnan Jin, Hongru Liang, Tat-Seng Chua
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used to meet user information needs, but their effectiveness in dealing with user queries that contain various types of ambiguity remains unknown, ultimately risking user trust and satisfaction. To this end, we introduce CLAMBER, a benchmark for evaluating LLMs using a well-organized taxonomy. Building upon the taxonomy, we construct ∼ 12K high-quality data to assess the strengths, weaknesses, and potential risks of various off-theshelf LLMs. Our findings indicate the limited practical utility of current LLMs in identifying and clarifying ambiguous user queries, even enhanced by chain-of-thought (CoT) and few-shot prompting. These techniques may result in overconfidence in LLMs and yield only marginal enhancements in identifying ambiguity. Furthermore, current LLMs fall short in generating high-quality clarifying questions due to a lack of conflict resolution and inaccurate utilization of inherent knowledge. In this paper, CLAMBER presents a guidance and promotes further research on proactive and trustworthy LLMs. Our dataset is available at https://github.com/SCUNLP/CLAMBER.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers21
- Ambig-SWE: Interactive Agents to Overcome Underspecificity in Software EngineeringSanidhya Vijayvargiya, Xuhui Zhou, Akhila Yerukola, Maarten Sap et al.ICLR 2026 · 35 citations
- Knowledge Boundary of Large Language Models: A SurveyMoxin Li, Yong Zhao, Wenxuan Zhang, Shuaiyi Li et al.ACL 2025 · 33 citations
- Semantic Volume: Quantifying and Detecting Both External and Internal Uncertainty in LLMsXiaomin Li, Zhou Yu, Ziji Zhang, Yingying Zhuang et al.AAAI 2026 · 11 citations
- Do not Abstain! Identify and Solve the UncertaintyJingyu Liu, Jingquan Peng, Xiaopeng Wu, Xubin Li et al.ACL 2025 · 8 citations
- RAGTrace: Understanding and Refining Retrieval-Generation Dynamics in Retrieval-Augmented GenerationSizhe Cheng, Jiaping Li, Huanchen Wang, Yuxin MaUIST 2025 · 6 citations
Builds on12
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Can LLMs Express Their Uncertainty? An Empirical Evaluation of Confidence Elicitation in LLMsMiao Xiong, Zhiyuan Hu, Xinyang Lu, Yifei Li et al.ICLR 2024 · 867 citations
- Generating Clarifying Questions for Information RetrievalHamed Zamani, Susan T. Dumais, Nick Craswell, Paul N. Bennett et al.WWW 2020 · 238 citations
- AmbigQA: Answering Ambiguous Open-domain QuestionsSewon Min, Julian Michael, Hannaneh Hajishirzi, Luke ZettlemoyerEMNLP 2020 · 162 citations
Related papers
- Clarifying Ambiguities: on the Role of Ambiguity Types in Prompting Methods for Clarification GenerationAnfu Tang, Laure Soulier, Vincent GuigueSIGIR 2025 · 6 citations
- CLEAR: A Parser-Independent Disambiguation Framework for NL2SQLMeng Zhang, Kexin Ma, Liyang Xu, Kedi Zhang et al.ICDE 2025 · 4 citations
- AmbigNLG: Addressing Task Ambiguity in Instruction for NLGAyana Niwa, Hayate IsoEMNLP 2024 · 2 citations
- SQUAB: Evaluating LLM robustness to Ambiguous and Unanswerable Questions in Semantic ParsingSimone Papicchio, Luca Cagliero, Paolo PapottiEMNLP 2025
- Disambiguation in Conversational Question Answering in the Era of LLMs and Agents: A SurveyMd. Mehrab Tanjim, Yeonjun In, Xiang Chen, Victor S. Bursztyn et al.EMNLP 2025 · 2 citations
