Do not Abstain! Identify and Solve the Uncertainty
Jingyu Liu, Jingquan Peng, Xiaopeng Wu, Xubin Li, Tiezheng Ge, Bo Zheng, Yong Liu
Abstract
Despite the widespread application of Large Language Models (LLMs) across various domains, they frequently exhibit overconfidence when encountering uncertain scenarios, yet existing solutions primarily rely on evasive responses (e.g.,"I don't know") overlooks the opportunity of identifying and addressing the uncertainty to generate more satisfactory responses. To systematically investigate and improve LLMs' ability of recognizing and addressing the source of uncertainty, we introduce ConfuseBench, a benchmark mainly focus on three types of uncertainty: document scarcity, limited capability, and query ambiguity. Experiments with ConfuseBench reveal that current LLMs struggle to accurately identify the root cause of uncertainty and solve it. They prefer to attribute uncertainty to query ambiguity while overlooking capability limitations, especially for those weaker models. To tackle this challenge, we first generate context-aware inquiries that highlight the confusing aspect of the original query. Then we judge the source of uncertainty based on the uniqueness of the inquiry's answer. Further we use an on-policy training method, InteractDPO to generate better inquiries. Experimental results demonstrate the efficacy of our approach.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 149e1183-f0a2-4502-9a5c-e2caeedebbcdCited by top-tier papers3
- AQuA: Toward Strategic Response Generation for Ambiguous Visual QuestionsJihyoung Jang, Hyounghun KimICLR 2026 · 1 citation
- Quantifying and Understanding Uncertainty in Large Reasoning ModelsYangyi Li, Chenxu Zhao, Mengdi HuaiACL 2026
- Demystifying Uncertainty in LLMs: Active Calibration between Concepts and Human EvaluationsPengqi Li, Lizhong Ding, Zhehao Zhou, Chunhui Zhang et al.ACL 2026
Builds on15
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP TasksPatrick Lewis, Ethan Perez, Aleksandra Piktus, Fabio Petroni et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 19,162 citations
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language ModelsShunyu Yao, Dian Yu, Jeffrey Zhao, Izhak Shafran et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 5,068 citations
Related papers
- Beyond "I Don't Know": Evaluating LLM Self-Awareness in Discriminating Data and Model UncertaintyJingyi Ren, Ante Wang, Yunghwei Lai, Xiaolong Wang et al.ACL 2026 · 1 citation
- CLAMBER: A Benchmark of Identifying and Clarifying Ambiguous Information Needs in Large Language ModelsTong Zhang, Peixin Qin, Yang Deng, Chen Huang et al.ACL 2024
- CAR-bench: Evaluating the Consistency and Limit-Awareness of LLM Agents under Real-World UncertaintyJohannes Kirmayr, Lukas Stappen, Elisabeth AndréACL 2026 · 5 citations
- Reflect Then Learn: Active Prompting for Information Extraction Guided by Introspective ConfusionDong Zhao, Yadong Wang, Xiang Chen, Chenxi Wang et al.AAAI 2026
- FollowBench: A Multi-level Fine-grained Constraints Following Benchmark for Large Language ModelsYuxin Jiang, Yufei Wang, Xingshan Zeng, Wanjun Zhong et al.ACL 2024 · 10 citations
