AQuA: Toward Strategic Response Generation for Ambiguous Visual Questions
Jihyoung Jang, Hyounghun Kim
Abstract
Visual Question Answering (VQA) is a core task for evaluating the capabilities of Vision-Language Models (VLMs). Existing VQA benchmarks primarily feature clear and unambiguous image-question pairs, whereas real-world scenarios often involve varying degrees of ambiguity that require nuanced reasoning and context-appropriate response strategies. Although recent studies have begun to address ambiguity in VQA, they lack (1) a systematic categorization of ambiguity levels and (2) datasets and models that support strategy-aware responses. In this paper, we introduce Ambiguous Visual Question Answering (AQUA), a fine-grained dataset that classifies ambiguous VQA instances into four levels according to the nature and degree of ambiguity, along with the optimal response strategy for each case. Our evaluation of diverse open-source and proprietary VLMs shows that most models fail to adapt their strategy to the ambiguity type, frequently producing overconfident answers rather than seeking clarification or acknowledging uncertainty. To address this challenge, we fine-tune VLMs on AQUA, enabling them to adaptively choose among multiple response strategies, such as directly answering, inferring intent from contextual cues, listing plausible alternatives, or requesting clarification. VLMs trained on AQUA achieve strategic response generation for ambiguous VQA, demonstrating the ability to recognize ambiguity, manage uncertainty, and respond with context-appropriate strategies, while outperforming both open-source and closed-source baselines. 1
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 6f996ced-a037-40e2-bd26-8edee654b1f6Builds on13
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Visual Instruction TuningHaotian Liu, Chunyuan Li, Qingyang Wu, Yong Jae LeeNeurIPS 2023 · 11,349 citations
- InstructBLIP: Towards General-purpose Vision-Language Models with Instruction TuningWenliang Dai, Junnan Li, Dongxu Li, Anthony Meng Huat Tiong et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 4,013 citations
- Scene Text Visual Question AnsweringAli Furkan Biten, Rubèn Tito, Andrés Mafla, Lluís Gómez i Bigorda et al.ICCV 2019 · 482 citations
- AmbigQA: Answering Ambiguous Open-domain QuestionsSewon Min, Julian Michael, Hannaneh Hajishirzi, Luke ZettlemoyerEMNLP 2020 · 162 citations
Related papers
- Teaching Vision-Language Models to Ask: Resolving Ambiguity in Visual QuestionsPu Jian, Donglei Yu, Wen Yang, Shuo Ren et al.ACL 2025
- Right this way: Can VLMs Guide Us to See More to Answer Questions?Li Liu, Diji Yang, Sijia Zhong, Kalyana Suma Sree Tholeti et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 20 citations
- Learn 3D VQA Better with Active Selection and ReannotationShengli Zhou, Yang Liu, Feng ZhengACM MM 2025 · 2 citations
- Acknowledging Focus Ambiguity in Visual QuestionsChongyan Chen, Yu-Yun Tseng, Zhuoheng Li, Anush Venkatesh et al.ICCV 2025 · 1 citation
- VinQA: Visual Elements Interleaved Long-form Answer Generation for Real-World Multimodal Document QAYoungrok Jang, Hyesoo Kong, Kyunghwan An, Jae Sub Huh et al.CVPR 2026
