Can LLMs Express Their Uncertainty? An Empirical Evaluation of Confidence Elicitation in LLMs
Miao Xiong, Zhiyuan Hu, Xinyang Lu, Yifei Li, Jie Fu, Junxian He, Bryan Hooi
Abstract
Empowering large language models (LLMs) to accurately express confidence in their answers is essential for reliable and trustworthy decision-making. Previous confidence elicitation methods, which primarily rely on white-box access to internal model information or model fine-tuning, have become less suitable for LLMs, especially closed-source commercial APIs. This leads to a growing need to explore the untapped area of black-box approaches for LLM uncertainty estimation. To better break down the problem, we define a systematic framework with three components: prompting strategies for eliciting verbalized confidence, sampling methods for generating multiple responses, and aggregation techniques for computing consistency. We then benchmark these methods on two key tasks-confidence calibration and failure prediction-across five types of datasets (e.g., commonsense and arithmetic reasoning) and five widely-used LLMs including GPT-4 and LLaMA 2 Chat. Our analysis uncovers several key insights: 1) LLMs, when verbalizing their confidence, tend to be overconfident, potentially imitating human patterns of expressing confidence. 2) As model capability scales up, both calibration and failure prediction performance improve, yet still far from ideal performance. 3) Employing our proposed strategies, such as human-inspired prompts, consistency among multiple responses, and better aggregation strategies can help mitigate this overconfidence from various perspectives. 4) Comparisons with white-box methods indicate that while white-box methods perform better, the gap is narrow, e.g., 0.522 to 0.605 in AUROC. Despite these advancements, none of these techniques consistently outperform others, and all investigated methods struggle in challenging tasks, such as those requiring professional knowledge, indicating significant scope for improvement. We believe this study can serve as a strong baseline and provide insights for eliciting confidence in black-box LLMs. The code is publicly available at https://github.com/MiaoXiong2320/llm-uncertainty .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 2e455844-7d7a-4d0e-865f-684ba54a984eCited by top-tier papers226
- Can LLM-Generated Misinformation Be Detected?Canyu Chen, Kai ShuICLR 2024 · 270 citations
- Large Language Model Cascades with Mixture of Thought Representations for Cost-Efficient ReasoningMurong Yue, Jie Zhao, Min Zhang, Liang Du et al.ICLR 2024 · 153 citations
- HaloScope: Harnessing Unlabeled LLM Generations for Hallucination DetectionXuefeng Du, Chaowei Xiao, Sharon LiNeurIPS 2024 · 131 citations
- Large Language Models Must Be Taught to Know What They Don't KnowSanyam Kapoor, Nate Gruver, Manley Roberts, Katie Collins et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 124 citations
- Beyond Binary Rewards: Training LMs to Reason About Their UncertaintyMehul Damani, Isha Puri, Stewart Slocum, Idan Shenfeld et al.ICLR 2026 · 116 citations
Builds on16
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Large Language Models are Zero-Shot ReasonersTakeshi Kojima, Shixiang Shane Gu, Machel Reid, Yutaka Matsuo et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 8,168 citations
- Measuring Massive Multitask Language UnderstandingDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou et al.ICLR 2021 · 7,905 citations
- Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language ModelsXuezhi Wang, Jason Wei, Dale Schuurmans, Quoc V. Le et al.ICLR 2023 · 681 citations
- Revisiting the Calibration of Modern Neural NetworksMatthias Minderer, Josip Djolonga, Rob Romijnders, Frances Hubis et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 633 citations
Related papers
- Confidence Elicitation: A New Attack Vector for Large Language ModelsBrian Formento, Chuan-Sheng Foo, See-Kiong NgICLR 2025
- Confidence Under the Hood: An Investigation into the Confidence-Probability Alignment in Large Language ModelsAbhishek Kumar, Robert Morabito, Sanzhar Umbet, Jad Kabbara et al.ACL 2024 · 9 citations
- MetaFaith: Faithful Natural Language Uncertainty Expression in LLMsGabrielle Kaili-May Liu, Gal Yona, Avi Caciularu, Idan Szpektor et al.EMNLP 2025
- Calibrating Large Language Models Using Their Generations OnlyDennis Ulmer, Martin Gubri, Hwaran Lee, Sangdoo Yun et al.ACL 2024
- ConfTuner: Training Large Language Models to Express Their Confidence VerballyYibo Li, Miao Xiong, Jiaying Wu, Bryan HooiNeurIPS 2025 · 43 citations
