Semantic Volume: Quantifying and Detecting Both External and Internal Uncertainty in LLMs
Xiaomin Li, Zhou Yu, Ziji Zhang, Yingying Zhuang, Swair Shah, Narayanan Sadagopan, Anurag Beniwal
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable performance across diverse tasks by encoding vast amounts of factual knowledge. However, they are still prone to hallucinations, generating incorrect or misleading information, often accompanied by high uncertainty. Existing methods for hallucination detection primarily focus on quantifying internal uncertainty, which arises from missing or conflicting knowledge within the model. However, hallucinations can also stem from external uncertainty, where ambiguous user queries lead to multiple possible interpretations. In this work, we introduce Semantic Volume, a novel mathematical measure for quantifying both external and internal uncertainty in LLMs. Our approach perturbs queries and responses, embeds them in a semantic space, and computes the Gram matrix determinant of the embedding vectors, capturing their dispersion as a measure of uncertainty. Our framework provides a generalizable and unsupervised uncertainty detection method without requiring internal access to LLMs. We conduct extensive experiments on both external and internal uncertainty detections, demonstrating that our Semantic Volume method consistently outperforms existing baselines in both tasks. Additionally, we provide theoretical insights linking our measure to differential entropy, unifying and extending previous sampling-based uncertainty measures such as the semantic entropy. Semantic Volume is shown to be a robust and interpretable approach to improving the reliability of LLMs by systematically detecting uncertainty in both user queries and model responses.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers2
- Value of Information: A Framework for Human-Agent CommunicationYijiang River Dong, Tiancheng Hu, Zheng Hui, Caiqi Zhang et al.ACL 2026 · 8 citations
- “very likely” Means “uncertain”? How LLMs Diverge from Humans in Linguistic Uncertainty QuantificationJinhao Duan, Zicheng Liu, Zijie Liu, Kaidi Xu et al.ICML 2026
Builds on8
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP TasksPatrick Lewis, Ethan Perez, Aleksandra Piktus, Fabio Petroni et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 19,162 citations
- Uncertainty Estimation in Autoregressive Structured PredictionAndrey Malinin, Mark J. F. GalesICLR 2021 · 439 citations
- AmbigQA: Answering Ambiguous Open-domain QuestionsSewon Min, Julian Michael, Hannaneh Hajishirzi, Luke ZettlemoyerEMNLP 2020 · 162 citations
Related papers
- Kernel Language Entropy: Fine-grained Uncertainty Quantification for LLMs from Semantic SimilaritiesAlexander Nikitin, Jannik Kossen, Yarin Gal, Pekka MarttinenNeurIPS 2024 · 197 citations
- To Believe or Not to Believe Your LLM: Iterative Prompting for Estimating Epistemic UncertaintyYasin Abbasi-Yadkori, Ilja Kuzborskij, András György, Csaba SzepesváriNeurIPS 2024
- Efficient Hallucination Detection: Adaptive Bayesian Estimation of Semantic Entropy with Guided Semantic ExplorationQiyao Sun, Xingming Li, Xixiang He, Ao Cheng et al.AAAI 2026 · 1 citation
- Estimating Semantic Alphabet Size for LLM Uncertainty QuantificationLucas H. McCabe, Rimon Melamed, Tom Hartvigsen, H. Howie HuangICLR 2026 · 7 citations
- Improving Uncertainty Estimation through Semantically Diverse Language GenerationLukas Aichberger, Kajetan Schweighofer, Mykyta Ielanskyi, Sepp HochreiterICLR 2025
