AmbigNLG: Addressing Task Ambiguity in Instruction for NLG
Ayana Niwa, Hayate Iso
Abstract
We introduce AmbigNLG, a novel task designed to tackle the challenge of task ambiguity in instructions for Natural Language Generation (NLG). Ambiguous instructions often impede the performance of Large Language Models (LLMs), especially in complex NLG tasks. To tackle this issue, we propose an ambiguity taxonomy that categorizes different types of instruction ambiguities and refines initial instructions with clearer specifications. Accompanying this task, we present AmbigSNI-NLG, a dataset comprising 2,500 instances annotated to facilitate research in AmbigNLG. Through comprehensive experiments with state-of-the-art LLMs, we demonstrate that our method significantly enhances the alignment of generated text with user expectations, achieving up to a 15.02-point increase in ROUGE scores. Our findings highlight the critical importance of addressing task ambiguity to fully harness the capabilities of LLMs in NLG tasks. Furthermore, we confirm the effectiveness of our method in practical settings involving interactive ambiguity mitigation with users, underscoring the benefits of leveraging LLMs for interactive clarification.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 565d0ca5-f9a9-4530-a690-5e2e90ed821cCited by top-tier papers3
- Ambig-SWE: Interactive Agents to Overcome Underspecificity in Software EngineeringSanidhya Vijayvargiya, Xuhui Zhou, Akhila Yerukola, Maarten Sap et al.ICLR 2026 · 35 citations
- Correct-Detect: Balancing Performance and Ambiguity Through the Lens of Coreference Resolution in LLMsAmber Shore, Russell Scheinberg, Ameeta Agrawal, So Young LeeEMNLP 2025
- Identifying & Interactively Refining Ambiguous User Goals for Data Visualization Code GenerationMert Inan, Anthony Sicilia, Alex Xie, Saujas Vaduguru et al.EMNLP 2025
Builds on21
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- Measuring Massive Multitask Language UnderstandingDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou et al.ICLR 2021 · 7,905 citations
- FlashAttention: Fast and Memory-Efficient Exact Attention with IO-AwarenessTri Dao, Daniel Y. Fu, Stefano Ermon, Atri Rudra et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 5,493 citations
- Finetuned Language Models are Zero-Shot LearnersJason Wei, Maarten Bosma, Vincent Y. Zhao, Kelvin Guu et al.ICLR 2022 · 4,966 citations
Related papers
- AmbiK: Dataset of Ambiguous Tasks in Kitchen EnvironmentAnastasiia Ivanova, Eva Bakaeva, Zoya Volovikova, Alexey K. Kovalev et al.ACL 2025
- Task Ambiguity in Humans and Language ModelsAlex Tamkin, Kunal Handa, Avash Shrestha, Noah D. GoodmanICLR 2023 · 8 citations
- CLAMBER: A Benchmark of Identifying and Clarifying Ambiguous Information Needs in Large Language ModelsTong Zhang, Peixin Qin, Yang Deng, Chen Huang et al.ACL 2024
- Active Task Disambiguation with LLMsKasia Kobalczyk, Nicolás Astorga, Tennison Liu, Mihaela van der SchaarICLR 2025
- Did You Read the Instructions? Rethinking the Effectiveness of Task Definitions in Instruction LearningFan Yin, Jesse Vig, Philippe Laban, Shafiq Joty et al.ACL 2023 · 7 citations
