Do Teachers Dream of GenAI Widening Educational (In)equality? Envisioning the Future of K-12 GenAI Education from Global Teachers' Perspectives
Ruiwei Xiao, Qing Xiao, Xinying Hou, Phenyo Phemelo Moletsane, Hanqi Jane Li, Hong Shen, John C. Stamper
Abstract
Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) is rapidly entering K-12 classrooms worldwide, initiating urgent debates about its potential to either reduce or exacerbate educational inequalities. Drawing on interviews with 30 K-12 teachers across the United States, South Africa, and Taiwan, this study examines how teachers navigate this GenAI tension around educational equalities. We found teachers actively framed GenAI education as an equality-oriented practice: they used it to alleviate pre-existing inequalities while simultaneously working to prevent new inequalities from emerging. Despite these efforts, teachers confronted persistent systemic barriers, i.e., unequal infrastructure, insufficient professional training, and restrictive social norms, that individual initiative alone could not overcome. Teachers thus articulated normative visions for more inclusive GenAI education. By centering teachers' practices, constraints, and future envisions, this study contributes a global account of how GenAI education is being integrated into K-12 contexts and highlights what is required to make its adoption genuinely equal.
• Human-centered computing → Empirical studies in collaborative and social computing; Empirical studies in HCI .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 510658e4-a893-4c24-8f7e-dfea4d1b41dfBuilds on18
- What is AI Literacy? Competencies and Design ConsiderationsDuri Long, Brian MagerkoCHI 2020 · 2,947 citations
- Engaging Teachers to Co-Design Integrated AI Curriculum for K-12 ClassroomsPhoebe Lin, Jessica Van BrummelenCHI 2021 · 188 citations
- Teachers, Parents, and Students' perspectives on Integrating Generative AI into Elementary Literacy EducationAriel Han, Xiaofei Zhou, Zhenyao Cai, Shenshen Han et al.CHI 2024 · 104 citations
- "Don't Forget the Teachers": Towards an Educator-Centered Understanding of Harms from Large Language Models in EducationEmma Harvey, Allison Koenecke, René F. KizilcecCHI 2025 · 63 citations
- The State and Fate of Linguistic Diversity and Inclusion in the NLP WorldPratik Joshi, Sebastin Santy, Amar Budhiraja, Kalika Bali et al.ACL 2020 · 40 citations
Related papers
- Relief or displacement? How teachers are negotiating generative AI's role in their professional practiceAayushi Dangol, Smriti Kotiyal, Robert Wolfe, Alex J. Bowers et al.CHI 2026 · 5 citations
- Amplifying Rural Educators' Perspectives: A Qualitative Study on the Impacts of Generative AI in Rural U.S. High SchoolsShira Michel, Benjamin Taylor, Sabrina Parra Díaz, Joseph B. Wiggins et al.CHI 2026 · 2 citations
- Understanding Educators' Perceptions of AI-generated Non-consensual Intimate ImageryTongxin Li, Katelyn M. Reyes, Liezeil Jimenez, Katie S. Nam et al.CHI 2026 · 1 citation
- Barriers that Programming Instructors Face While Performing Emergency Pedagogical Design to Shape Student-AI Interactions with Generative AI ToolsSam Lau, Kianoosh Boroojeni, Harry Keeling, Jenn MarroquinCHI 2026 · 1 citation
- Whose Knowledge Counts? Co-Designing Community-Centered AI Auditing Tools with Educators in Hawai'iDora Zhao, Hannah Cha, Michael J. Ryan, Angelina Wang et al.CHI 2026 · 1 citation
