Whose Knowledge Counts? Co-Designing Community-Centered AI Auditing Tools with Educators in Hawai'i
Dora Zhao, Hannah Cha, Michael J. Ryan, Angelina Wang, Rachel Baker-Ramos, Evyn-Bree Helekahi-Kaiwi, Rebecca Diego, Josiah D. Hester, Diyi Yang
Abstract
Although generative AI is being deployed into classrooms with promises of aiding teachers, educators caution that these tools can have unintended pedagogical repercussions, including cultural misrepresentation and bias. These concerns are heightened in lowresource language and Indigenous education settings, where AI systems frequently underperform. We investigate these challenges in Hawai'i, where public schools operate under a statewide mandate to integrate Hawaiian language and culture into education. Through four co-design workshops with 22 public school educators, we surfaced concerns about using generative AI in educational settings, particularly around cultural misrepresentation, and corresponding designs for auditing tools that address these issues. We find that educators envision tools grounded in specific Hawaiian cultural values and practices, such as tracing the genealogy of knowledge in source materials. Building on these insights, we conceptualize AI auditing as a community-oriented process rather than the work of isolated individuals, and discuss implications for designing auditing tools.
• Human-centered computing → Empirical studies in HCI.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext c59afb24-4a9c-4e25-97e9-e18eedabff58Builds on23
- Eliciting Tech Futures Among Black Young Adults: A Case Study of Remote Speculative Co-DesignChristina N. Harrington, Tawanna R. DillahuntCHI 2021 · 171 citations
- Everyday Algorithm Auditing: Understanding the Power of Everyday Users in Surfacing Harmful Algorithmic BehaviorsHong Shen, Alicia DeVos, Motahhare Eslami, Kenneth HolsteinCSCW 2021 · 156 citations
- From Treatment to Healing: Envisioning a Decolonial Digital Mental HealthSachin R. Pendse, Daniel Nkemelu, Nicola J. Bidwell, Sushrut Jadhav et al.CHI 2022 · 113 citations
- Toward User-Driven Algorithm Auditing: Investigating users' strategies for uncovering harmful algorithmic behaviorAlicia DeVos, Aditi Dhabalia, Hong Shen, Kenneth Holstein et al.CHI 2022 · 96 citations
- MEGA: Multilingual Evaluation of Generative AIKabir Ahuja, Harshita Diddee, Rishav Hada, Millicent Ochieng et al.EMNLP 2023 · 91 citations
Related papers
- Barriers that Programming Instructors Face While Performing Emergency Pedagogical Design to Shape Student-AI Interactions with Generative AI ToolsSam Lau, Kianoosh Boroojeni, Harry Keeling, Jenn MarroquinCHI 2026 · 1 citation
- Do Teachers Dream of GenAI Widening Educational (In)equality? Envisioning the Future of K-12 GenAI Education from Global Teachers' PerspectivesRuiwei Xiao, Qing Xiao, Xinying Hou, Phenyo Phemelo Moletsane et al.CHI 2026 · 4 citations
- Teachers, Parents, and Students' perspectives on Integrating Generative AI into Elementary Literacy EducationAriel Han, Xiaofei Zhou, Zhenyao Cai, Shenshen Han et al.CHI 2024 · 104 citations
- Participatory, not Punitive: Student-Driven AI Policy Recommendations in a Design ClassroomKaoru Seki, Manisha Vijay, Yasmine KotturiCHI 2026
- Amplifying Rural Educators' Perspectives: A Qualitative Study on the Impacts of Generative AI in Rural U.S. High SchoolsShira Michel, Benjamin Taylor, Sabrina Parra Díaz, Joseph B. Wiggins et al.CHI 2026 · 2 citations
