Barriers that Programming Instructors Face While Performing Emergency Pedagogical Design to Shape Student-AI Interactions with Generative AI Tools
Sam Lau, Kianoosh Boroojeni, Harry Keeling, Jenn Marroquin
Abstract
Generative AI (GenAI) tools are increasingly pervasive, pushing instructors to redesign how students use GenAI tools in coursework. We conceptualize this work as emergency pedagogical design: reactive, indirect efforts by instructors to shape student-AI interactions without control over commercial interfaces. To understand practices of lead users conducting emergency pedagogical design, we conducted interviews (𝑛=13) and a survey (𝑛=169) of computing instructors. These instructors repeatedly encountered five barriers: fragmented buy-in for revising courses; policy crosswinds from non-prescriptive institutional guidance; implementation challenges as instructors attempt interventions; assessment misfit as student-AI interactions are only partially visible to instructors; and lack of resources, including time, staffing, and paid tool access. We use these findings to present emergency pedagogical design as a distinct design setting for HCI and outline recommendations for HCI researchers, academic institutions, and organizations to effectively support instructors in adapting courses to GenAI.
• Human-centered computing → Empirical studies in HCI.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 545b5222-6448-4d77-b458-de4355b9d1b4Builds on20
- SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-world Github Issues?Carlos E. Jimenez, John Yang, Alexander Wettig, Shunyu Yao et al.ICLR 2024 · 2,082 citations
- Why Johnny Can't Prompt: How Non-AI Experts Try (and Fail) to Design LLM PromptsJ. D. Zamfirescu-Pereira, Richmond Y. Wong, Bjoern Hartmann, Qian YangCHI 2023 · 892 citations
- Studying the effect of AI Code Generators on Supporting Novice Learners in Introductory ProgrammingMajeed Kazemitabaar, Justin Chow, Carl Ka To Ma, Barbara J. Ericson et al.CHI 2023 · 348 citations
- The Metacognitive Demands and Opportunities of Generative AILev Tankelevitch, Viktor Kewenig, Auste Simkute, Ava Elizabeth Scott et al.CHI 2024 · 279 citations
- CodeAid: Evaluating a Classroom Deployment of an LLM-based Programming Assistant that Balances Student and Educator NeedsMajeed Kazemitabaar, Runlong Ye, Xiaoning Wang, Austin Zachary Henley et al.CHI 2024 · 246 citations
Related papers
- Toward Scalable and Responsible Integration of Course-Specific AI Tutors: Instructor Experiences with a Campus-Wide PlatformEunhye Grace Ko, Hakeoung Hannah Lee, Anjali Singh, Lily Boddy et al.CHI 2026 · 2 citations
- Participatory, not Punitive: Student-Driven AI Policy Recommendations in a Design ClassroomKaoru Seki, Manisha Vijay, Yasmine KotturiCHI 2026
- Situated Imaginaries: Designing AI Futures with Computer Science Teaching AssistantsGrace Barkhuff, Ian Pruitt, Vyshnavi Namani, William Gregory Johnson et al.CHI 2026 · 1 citation
- Understanding Educators' Perceptions of AI-generated Non-consensual Intimate ImageryTongxin Li, Katelyn M. Reyes, Liezeil Jimenez, Katie S. Nam et al.CHI 2026 · 1 citation
- "I'd Never Actually Realized How Big An Impact It Had Until Now": Perspectives of University Students with Disabilities on Generative Artificial IntelligenceAlex Atcheson, Omar Khan, Brian Siemann, Anika Jain et al.CHI 2025 · 22 citations
