"I'd Never Actually Realized How Big An Impact It Had Until Now": Perspectives of University Students with Disabilities on Generative Artificial Intelligence
Alex Atcheson, Omar Khan, Brian Siemann, Anika Jain, Karrie Karahalios
Abstract
Prior research on the experiences of students with disabilities in higher education has surfaced a number of barriers that prevent full inclusion. Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) has begun to attract interest for its potential to address longstanding barriers to access. However, little is known about the impact of these tools on the living and learning experiences of post-secondary students with disabilities. As a mixed-abilities team, we investigated student experiences with GenAI tools by collecting survey and interview responses from 62 and 21 students with disabilities, respectively, across two universities to measure students’ use of GenAI tools and their perspectives on the impact of these tools in ways related to disability, university support, and sense of belonging. Despite concerns over potential risks of GenAI and unclear university policies, students described GenAI tools as a useful resource for personalizing learning, promoting self-care, and assisting with important self-advocacy work. Guidance demonstrating safe, acceptable uses of GenAI tools, along with clear policies and resources that acknowledge diverse student needs, were desired. We discuss implications of these tools for accessibility and inclusion in higher education.
Ask about this paper
Ask your agent about it.
Lune has read the top-tier papers around this one, so every answer names the papers it rests on.
Your agent calls
Lunesearch_papers
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers get c0b78809-5757-42ef-9293-2f5cb58acfa5Cited by top-tier papers5
- Do Teachers Dream of GenAI Widening Educational (In)equality? Envisioning the Future of K-12 GenAI Education from Global Teachers' PerspectivesRuiwei Xiao, Qing Xiao, Xinying Hou, Phenyo Phemelo Moletsane et al.CHI 2026 · 4 citations
- Robot-Assisted Social Dining as a White Glove ServiceAtharva S. Kashyap, Ugne Aleksandra Morkute, Patrícia Alves-OliveiraCHI 2026 · 2 citations
- Creating Disability Story Videos with Generative AI: Motivation, Expression, and SharingShuo Niu, Dylan Clements, Hyungsin KimCHI 2026 · 1 citation
- Surveilling Suitability: How AI Hiring Interviews Impact Job Seekers with DisabilitiesVaishnav Kameswaran, Valentina Hong, Jazmin Clark, Yu Hou et al.CHI 2026 · 1 citation
- From Struggle to Success: Context-Aware Guidance for Screen Reader Users in Computer UseNan Chen, Jing Lu, Zilong Wang, Luna K. Qiu et al.CHI 2026 · 1 citation
Related papers
- "I Don't Trust it, but I Use it": Navigating Trust, Privacy, and Identity in Disabled People's Use of Generative AIJazette Johnson, Aaleyah Lewis, Jennifer Mankoff, Olivia BannerCHI 2026 · 4 citations
- Autoethnographic Insights from Neurodivergent GAI "Power Users"Kate Glazko, Junhyeok Cha, Aaleyah Lewis, Ben Kosa et al.CHI 2025 · 15 citations
- Examining Student and Teacher Perspectives on Undisclosed Use of Generative AI in Academic WorkRudaiba Adnin, Atharva Pandkar, Bingsheng Yao, Dakuo Wang et al.CHI 2025 · 15 citations
- Scaffolding Metacognition with GenAI: Exploring Design Opportunities to Support Task Management for University Students with ADHDZihao Zhu, Junnan Yu, Yuhan LuoCHI 2026 · 4 citations
- Privacy and Trust vs. Utility: Adoption of Commercial vs. Institutional AI assistants Among University UsersYuting Yang, Zixin Wang, Rongjun Ma, Florian SchaubCHI 2026 · 1 citation
