Surveilling Suitability: How AI Hiring Interviews Impact Job Seekers with Disabilities
Vaishnav Kameswaran, Valentina Hong, Jazmin Clark, Yu Hou, Hal Daumé III, Katie Shilton
Abstract
AI hiring interviews, asynchronous video recording platforms that use AI to assess candidate suitability, are increasingly used by employers to streamline hiring processes. These platforms often promise to standardize assessments and mitigate subjective biases in hiring decisions. Yet, little is known about how these technologies are perceived and experienced by people with disabilities, a group historically underrepresented in the workforce and particularly vulnerable to injustices perpetuated by technology. To address this gap, we conducted focus groups and semi-structured interviews with 19 people with disabilities. We found that people with disabilities perceive and experience discrimination by AI hiring interviews that: 1) center normative characteristics, 2) exacerbate information asymmetries, 3) undermine autonomy, and 4) intrude on privacy. We use the analytical frame of surveillance to interrogate the role of AI in reconfiguring social relations between job seekers and employers. We discuss implications of our work for design and policy.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 8f03fa97-b368-4e98-ab38-53620c915ffbBuilds on24
- Algorithmic Management Reimagined For Workers and By Workers: Centering Worker Well-Being in Gig WorkAngie Zhang, Alexander Boltz, Chun Wei Wang, Min Kyung LeeCHI 2022 · 166 citations
- Emotion AI at Work: Implications for Workplace Surveillance, Emotional Labor, and Emotional PrivacyKat Roemmich, Florian Schaub, Nazanin AndalibiCHI 2023 · 123 citations
- "The less I type, the better": How AI Language Models can Enhance or Impede Communication for AAC UsersStephanie Valencia, Richard Cave, Krystal Kallarackal, Katie Seaver et al.CHI 2023 · 92 citations
- Optimizing for Happiness and Productivity: Modeling Opportune Moments for Transitions and Breaks at WorkHarmanpreet Kaur, Alex C. Williams, Daniel McDuff, Mary Czerwinski et al.CHI 2020 · 83 citations
- To Live in Their Utopia: Why Algorithmic Systems Create Absurd OutcomesAli AlkhatibCHI 2021 · 80 citations
Related papers
- U.S. Job-Seekers' Organizational Justice Perceptions of Emotion AI-Enabled InterviewsCassidy Pyle, Kat Roemmich, Nazanin AndalibiCSCW 2024 · 19 citations
- Disqualified by Disability: The Exclusion of Disabled Workers by Digitized Hiring AssessmentsMichal Luria, Matthew U. Scherer, Ariana Aboulafia, Dhanaraj ThakurCHI 2026 · 1 citation
- Understanding the Telework Experience of People with DisabilitiesJohn C. TangCSCW 2021 · 107 citations
- Skin-Deep Bias: How Avatar Appearances Shape Perceptions of AI HiringKa Hei Carrie Lau, Philipp Stark, Efe Bozkir, Enkelejda KasneciCHI 2026 · 1 citation
- Asymmetries in Online Job-Seeking: A Case Study of Muslim-American WomenTanisha Afnan, Hawra Rabaan, Kyle M. L. Jones, Lynn DombrowskiCSCW 2021 · 10 citations
