Optimizing for Happiness and Productivity: Modeling Opportune Moments for Transitions and Breaks at Work
Harmanpreet Kaur, Alex C. Williams, Daniel McDuff, Mary Czerwinski, Jaime Teevan, Shamsi T. Iqbal
Abstract
Information workers perform jobs that demand constant multitasking, leading to context switches, productivity loss, stress, and unhappiness. Systems that can mediate task transitions and breaks have the potential to keep people both productive and happy. We explore a crucial initial step for this goal: finding opportune moments to recommend transitions and breaks without disrupting people during focused states. Using affect, workstation activity, and task data from a three-week field study (N=25), we build models to predict whether a person should continue their task, transition to a new task, or take a break. The R-squared values of our models are as high as 0.7, with only 15% error cases. We ask users to evaluate the timing of recommendations provided by a recommender that relies on these models. Our study shows that users find our transition and break recommendations to be well-timed, rating them as 86% and 77% accurate, respectively. We conclude with a discussion of the implications for intelligent systems that seek to guide task transitions and manage interruptions at work.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 9bddba37-e58b-4183-89fa-5512611531f4Cited by top-tier papers20
- Emotion AI at Work: Implications for Workplace Surveillance, Emotional Labor, and Emotional PrivacyKat Roemmich, Florian Schaub, Nazanin AndalibiCHI 2023 · 123 citations
- Digital Emotion Regulation in Everyday LifeWally Smith, Greg Wadley, Sarah Webber, Benjamin Tag et al.CHI 2022 · 76 citations
- "I Didn't Know I Looked Angry": Characterizing Observed Emotion and Reported Affect at WorkHarmanpreet Kaur, Daniel McDuff, Alex C. Williams, Jaime Teevan et al.CHI 2022 · 68 citations
- Social-Emotional-Sensory Design Map for Affective Computing Informed by Neurodivergent ExperiencesAnnuska Zolyomi, Jaime SnyderCSCW 2021 · 43 citations
- Algorithmic Power or Punishment: Information Worker Perspectives on Passive Sensing Enabled AI Phenotyping of Performance and WellbeingVedant Das Swain, Lan Gao, William A. Wood, Srikruthi C. Matli et al.CHI 2023 · 42 citations
Related papers
- A Multi-Sensor Approach to Automatically Recognize Breaks and Work Activities of Knowledge Workers in AcademiaElena Di Lascio, Shkurta Gashi, Juan Sebastian Hidalgo, Beatrice Nale et al.UbiComp 2020 · 25 citations
- "I Got Some Free Time": Investigating Task-execution and Task-effort Metrics in Mobile Crowdsourcing TasksChia-En Chiang, Yu-Chun Chen, Fang-Yu Lin, Felicia Feng et al.CHI 2021 · 17 citations
- AR-Cues Change Users' Strategy for Dealing with Deferrable InterruptionsKilian L. Bahnsen, Tobias GrundgeigerCHI 2026 · 1 citation
- Breaking the Flow: A Study of Interruptions During Software Engineering ActivitiesYimeng Ma, Yu Huang, Kevin LeachICSE 2024 · 8 citations
- Focused Time Saves Nine: Evaluating Computer-Assisted Protected Time for Hybrid Information WorkVedant Das Swain, Javier Hernandez, Brian Houck, Koustuv Saha et al.CHI 2023 · 24 citations
