Lune

CHI2024Top-tier venue

Teachers, Parents, and Students' perspectives on Integrating Generative AI into Elementary Literacy Education

Ariel Han, Xiaofei Zhou, Zhenyao Cai, Shenshen Han, Richard Ko, Seth Corrigan, Kylie A. Peppler

2024Year
104Citations
20Top-tier citations

Abstract

The viral launch of new generative AI (GAI) systems, such as Chat-GPT and Text-to-Image (TTL) generators, sparked questions about how they can be efectively incorporated into writing education. However, it is still unclear how teachers, parents, and students perceive and suspect GAI systems in elementary school settings. We conducted a workshop with twelve families (parent-child dyads) with children ages 8-12 and interviewed sixteen teachers in order to understand each stakeholder's perspectives and opinions on GAI systems for learning and teaching writing. We found that the GAI systems could be benefcial in generating adaptable teaching materials for teachers, enhancing ideation, and providing students with personalized, timely feedback. However, there are concerns over authorship, students' agency in learning, and uncertainty concerning bias and misinformation. In this article, we discuss design strategies to mitigate these constraints by implementing an adults-oversight system, balancing AI-role allocation, and facilitating customization to enhance students' agency over writing projects.

• Human-centered computing → Empirical studies in HCI.

Ask about this paper

Your agent reads all of it.

Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.

Questions to start from

Your agent calls

Luneget_paper_fulltext

Ask in Lune

Free to start. No credit card required.

lune papers fulltext 434a1202-99ee-4e54-b84f-88b22b5f0f65

Cited by top-tier papers20

Ask how each one uses it

Builds on17

Related papers

Dusk over the sea between two cliffs drawn in fine vertical lines