An Empirical Study to Understand How Students Use ChatGPT for Writing Essays
Andrew Jelson, Daniel Manesh, Alice Jang, Daniel Dunlap, Young-Ho Kim, Sang Won Lee
Abstract
As large language models (LLMs) become widespread, students increasingly turn to systems like ChatGPT for writing tasks. Educators worry that this reliance may reduce critical engagement with writing and hinder students’ learning processes. Although datasets exist on students’ use of LLMs for writing, how they functionally use ChatGPT in detail—and how this usage shapes their writing and perceptions—remains underexplored. We conducted an online study (n=77) in which students wrote an essay using an in-house ChatGPT we developed to capture their queries. Through qualitative analysis, we identified the types of assistance students sought and presented patterns of use, ranging from asking for opinions on a topic to delegating the entire writing task to ChatGPT. We also found that students’ writing self-efficacy influenced their querying patterns and that levels of ownership and creativity varied depending on how they used ChatGPT. This study contributes empirical data to ongoing discussions about how writing education should incorporate or regulate LLM-powered tools.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 46b181cf-52b1-447d-8fa7-3abcbca09fa6Cited by top-tier papers2
- From Crafting Text to Crafting Thought: Grounding AI Writing Support to Writing Center PedagogyYijun Liu, John R. Gallagher, Sarah Sterman, Tal AugustCHI 2026 · 2 citations
- Telescope: Improving Zero Shot Detection of LLM Generated Content By Measuring Token Repetition ProbabilityChristopher Nassif, Joshua CooperICML 2026
Builds on18
- To Trust or to Think: Cognitive Forcing Functions Can Reduce Overreliance on AI in AI-assisted Decision-makingZana Buçinca, Maja Barbara Malaya, Krzysztof Z. GajosCSCW 2021 · 962 citations
- Why Johnny Can't Prompt: How Non-AI Experts Try (and Fail) to Design LLM PromptsJ. D. Zamfirescu-Pereira, Richmond Y. Wong, Bjoern Hartmann, Qian YangCHI 2023 · 892 citations
- The Impact of Generative AI on Critical Thinking: Self-Reported Reductions in Cognitive Effort and Confidence Effects From a Survey of Knowledge WorkersHao-Ping (Hank) Lee, Advait Sarkar, Lev Tankelevitch, Ian Drosos et al.CHI 2025 · 690 citations
- CoAuthor: Designing a Human-AI Collaborative Writing Dataset for Exploring Language Model CapabilitiesMina Lee, Percy Liang, Qian YangCHI 2022 · 340 citations
- Co-Writing with Opinionated Language Models Affects Users' ViewsMaurice Jakesch, Advait Bhat, Daniel Buschek, Lior Zalmanson et al.CHI 2023 · 249 citations
Related papers
- How Do Programming Students Use Generative AI?Christian Rahe, Walid MaalejFSE 2025 · 12 citations
- The Promise and Peril of ChatGPT in Higher Education: Opportunities, Challenges, and Design ImplicationsHyanghee Park, Daehwan AhnCHI 2024 · 80 citations
- "If the Machine Is As Good As Me, Then What Use Am I?" - How the Use of ChatGPT Changes Young Professionals' Perception of Productivity and AccomplishmentCharlotte Kobiella, Yarhy Said Flores López, Franz Waltenberger, Fiona Draxler et al.CHI 2024 · 54 citations
- Evaluating Large Language Models on Academic Literature Understanding and Review: An Empirical Study among Early-stage ScholarsJiyao Wang, Haolong Hu, Zuyuan Wang, Song Yan et al.CHI 2024 · 21 citations
- Understanding the Effect of Risk Perception on the Acceptance and Use of Large Language Models Among University StudentsMichael T. Rücker, Carolin Büchting, Thomas KoschCSCW 2025 · 4 citations
