Evaluating Text Creativity across Diverse Domains: a Dataset and Large Language Model Evaluator
Qian Cao, Xiting Wang, Yuzhuo Yuan, Yahui Liu, Fang Luo, Ruihua Song
Abstract
Creativity evaluation remains a challenging frontier for large language models (LLMs). Current evaluations heavily rely on inefficient and costly human judgments, hindering progress in enhancing machine creativity. While automated methods exist, ranging from psychological testing to heuristic- or prompting-based approaches, they often lack generalizability or alignment with human judgment. To address these issues, in this paper, we propose a novel pairwise-comparison framework for assessing textual creativity, leveraging shared contextual instructions to improve evaluation consistency. We introduce CreataSet, a large-scale dataset with 100K+ human-level and 1M+ synthetic creative instruction-response pairs spanning diverse open-domain tasks. Through training on CreataSet, we develop an LLM-based evaluator named CrEval. CrEval demonstrates remarkable superiority over existing methods in alignment with human judgments. Experimental results underscore the indispensable significance of integrating both human-generated and synthetic data in training highly robust evaluators, and showcase the practical utility of CrEval in boosting the creativity of LLMs. We will release all data, code, and models publicly to support further research.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 338bdfb1-c4a7-4a27-983d-8df384dc1e7eCited by top-tier papers3
- DPWriter: Reinforcement Learning with Diverse Planning Branching for Creative WritingQian Cao, Yahui Liu, Wei Bi, Yi Zhao et al.ACL 2026 · 3 citations
- Restoring Exploration after Post-Training: Latent Exploration Decoding for Large Reasoning ModelsWenhui Tan, Fiorenzo Parascandolo, Enver Sangineto, Jianzhong Ju et al.ICML 2026 · 2 citations
- DEFINED: A Data-Efficient Computational Framework for Fine-Grained Creativity Assessment in Debate ScenariosTongzhou Yu, Mingjia Li, Hong Qian, Wenkai Wang et al.KDD 2026 · 1 citation
Builds on21
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human FalsehoodsStephanie Lin, Jacob Hilton, Owain EvansACL 2022 · 3,228 citations
- ZeRO: memory optimizations toward training trillion parameter modelsSamyam Rajbhandari, Jeff Rasley, Olatunji Ruwase, Yuxiong HeSC 2020 · 852 citations
- G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using Gpt-4 with Better Human AlignmentYang Liu, Dan Iter, Yichong Xu, Shuohang Wang et al.EMNLP 2023 · 549 citations
- Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated InstructionsYizhong Wang, Yeganeh Kordi, Swaroop Mishra, Alisa Liu et al.ACL 2023 · 540 citations
Related papers
- CREval: An Automated Interpretable Evaluation for Creative Image Manipulation under Complex InstructionsChonghuinan Wang, Zihan Chen, Yuxiang Wei, Tianyi Jiang et al.CVPR 2026 · 3 citations
- CreBench: Human-Aligned Creativity Evaluation from Idea to Process to ProductKaiwen Xue, Chenglong Li, Zhonghong Ou, Guoxin Zhang et al.AAAI 2026
- Praetor: A Fine-Grained Generative LLM Evaluator with Instance-Level Customizable Evaluation CriteriaYongqi Leng, Renren Jin, Yue Chen, Zhuowen Han et al.ACL 2025
- Systematic Task Exploration with LLMs: A Study in Citation Text GenerationFurkan Sahinuç, Ilia Kuznetsov, Yufang Hou, Iryna GurevychACL 2024
- CritiqueLLM: Towards an Informative Critique Generation Model for Evaluation of Large Language Model GenerationPei Ke, Bosi Wen, Andrew Feng, Xiao Liu et al.ACL 2024 · 9 citations
