DEFINED: A Data-Efficient Computational Framework for Fine-Grained Creativity Assessment in Debate Scenarios
Tongzhou Yu, Mingjia Li, Hong Qian, Wenkai Wang, Zongbao Zhang, Yaoyu Jiang, Xiangfeng Wang, Aimin Zhou, Jiajun Guo
Abstract
Human creativity has emerged as a critical competency in the era of large language models. Assessing creativity in complex, open-ended environments is a grand challenge in data mining, currently hindered by a reliance on standardized simple tasks and the scarcity of fine-grained expert data. As an ecologically valid assessment context, debate reflects multiple dimensions of creativity, encompassing both divergent thinking and convergent thinking. Moreover, debate is a data-rich domain, with a large volume of publicly accessible materials. Current mainstream automated scoring methods are poorly suited to complex settings such as debate, and therefore still rely on costly human evaluation. To this end, this paper proposes DEFINED, a data-efficient computational framework for fine-grained creativity assessment in debate scenarios. DEFINED operationalizes debate creativity through a hierarchical eight-dimensional metric system, implemented via a pre-trained autoregressive language model with a hierarchical scoring head that supports both fine-grained and coarse-grained evaluation. Statements and their associated expert scores were obtained from authentic debate competitions, and a constrained data augmentation strategy was employed to address the elite bias inherent in the original data. DEFINED adopts a mixed-granularity training strategy enabling robust learning from limited fine-grained supervision annotated by trained graduate experts. To rigorously validate ecological validity beyond synthetic benchmarks, we incorporate an empirical study with debate-naive participants, utilizing these authentic data to serve as a qualitative case study for mid-to-low proficiency populations. Across our evaluation protocol, our scoring model achieves accurate and stable scoring, outperforming prompt-based large language model evaluators and existing debate scoring methods, while mitigating common failure modes observed in current approaches. The code for DEFINED is available on GitHub at https://github.com/tzwo/DEFINED.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext efa61b8f-c9a3-4921-bcd8-da4cda1bf593Builds on8
- LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language ModelsEdward J. Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu et al.ICLR 2022 · 18,833 citations
- A Large-Scale Dataset for Argument Quality Ranking: Construction and AnalysisShai Gretz, Roni Friedman, Edo Cohen-Karlik, Assaf Toledo et al.AAAI 2020 · 148 citations
- Evaluating Text Creativity across Diverse Domains: a Dataset and Large Language Model EvaluatorQian Cao, Xiting Wang, Yuzhuo Yuan, Yahui Liu et al.ICLR 2026 · 11 citations
- Orchid: Flexible and Data-Dependent Convolution for Sequence ModelingMahdi Karami, Ali GhodsiNeurIPS 2024 · 10 citations
- InspireDebate: Multi-Dimensional Subjective-Objective Evaluation-Guided Reasoning and Optimization for DebatingFuyu Wang, Jiangtong Li, Kun Zhu, Changjun JiangACL 2025 · 3 citations
Related papers
- Automated Creativity Evaluation of Language Models Across Open-Ended TasksTan Min Sen, Zachary Choy Kit Chun, Syed Ali Redha Alsagoff, Nadya Yuki Wangsajaya et al.ACL 2026
- Analyze-Compose-Execute: A Dynamic Dialogue Framework for Multi-Agent DebateWenyuan Gu, Haowen Wang, Jiale Han, Xiang Li et al.AAAI 2026
- Systematic Task Exploration with LLMs: A Study in Citation Text GenerationFurkan Sahinuç, Ilia Kuznetsov, Yufang Hou, Iryna GurevychACL 2024
- iMAD: Intelligent Multi-Agent Debate for Efficient and Accurate LLM InferenceWei Fan, JinYi Yoon, Bo JiAAAI 2026 · 5 citations
- Creativity or Brute Force? Using Brainteasers as a Window into the Problem-Solving Abilities of Large Language ModelsSophia Simeng Han, Howard Dai, Stephen Xia, Grant Zhang et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 2 citations
