CREval: An Automated Interpretable Evaluation for Creative Image Manipulation under Complex Instructions
Chonghuinan Wang, Zihan Chen, Yuxiang Wei, Tianyi Jiang, Xiaohe Wu, Fan Li, Wangmeng Zuo, Hongxun Yao
Abstract
Instruction-based multimodal image manipulation has recently made rapid progress. However, existing evaluation methods lack a systematic and human-aligned framework for assessing model performance on complex and creative editing tasks.To address this gap, we propose CREval, a fully automated question–answer (QA)–based evaluation pipeline that that overcomes the incompleteness and poor interpretability of opaque Large Language Models (MLLMs) scoring. Simultaneously, we introduce CREval-Bench, a comprehensive benchmark specifically designed for creative image manipulation under complex instructions. CREval-Bench covers three categories and nine creative dimensions, comprising over 800 editing samples and 13K evaluation queries.Leveraging this pipeline and benchmark, we systematically evaluate a diverse set of state-of-the-art open and closed-source models. The results reveal that while closed-source models generally outperform open-source ones on complex and creative tasks, all models still struggle to complete such edits effectively. In addition, user studies demonstrate strong consistency between CREval’s automated metrics and human judgments.Therefore, CREval provides a reliable foundation for evaluating image editing models on complex and creative image manipulation tasks, and highlights key challenges and opportunities for future research. All code and data will be released publicly.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext bc098523-18bc-42f9-a33c-9a28e4b4ec96Builds on30
- SDXL: Improving Latent Diffusion Models for High-Resolution Image SynthesisDustin Podell, Zion English, Kyle Lacey, Andreas Blattmann et al.ICLR 2024 · 4,569 citations
- Scaling Rectified Flow Transformers for High-Resolution Image SynthesisPatrick Esser, Sumith Kulal, Andreas Blattmann, Rahim Entezari et al.ICML 2024 · 3,620 citations
- TIFA: Accurate and Interpretable Text-to-Image Faithfulness Evaluation with Question AnsweringYushi Hu, Benlin Liu, Jungo Kasai, Yizhong Wang et al.ICCV 2023 · 400 citations
- OmniGen2: Towards Instruction-Aligned Multimodal GenerationChenyuan Wu, Jiahao Wang, Pengfei Zheng, Ruiran Yan et al.CVPR 2026 · 231 citations
- Flow Matching for Generative ModelingYaron Lipman, Ricky T. Q. Chen, Heli Ben-Hamu, Maximilian Nickel et al.ICLR 2023 · 87 citations
Related papers
- CreBench: Human-Aligned Creativity Evaluation from Idea to Process to ProductKaiwen Xue, Chenglong Li, Zhonghong Ou, Guoxin Zhang et al.AAAI 2026
- Creation-Mmbench: Assessing Context-Aware Creative Intelligence in MllmsXinyu Fang, Zhijian Chen, Kai Lan, Lixin Ma et al.ICCV 2025 · 23 citations
- I2I-Bench: A Comprehensive Benchmark Suite for Image-to-Image Editing ModelsJuntong Wang, Jiarui Wang, Huiyu Duan, Jiaxiang Kang et al.CVPR 2026 · 9 citations
- CompBench: Benchmarking Complex Instruction-guided Image EditingBohan Jia, Wenxuan Huang, Yuntian Tang, Junbo Qiao et al.CVPR 2026 · 17 citations
- I2EBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Instruction-based Image EditingYiwei Ma, Jiayi Ji, Ke Ye, Weihuang Lin et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 67 citations
