The Joint Effect of Task Similarity and Overparameterization on Catastrophic Forgetting - An Analytical Model
Daniel Goldfarb, Itay Evron, Nir Weinberger, Daniel Soudry, Paul Hand
Abstract
In continual learning, catastrophic forgetting is affected by multiple aspects of the tasks. Previous works have analyzed separately how forgetting is affected by either task similarity or overparameterization. In contrast, our paper examines how task similarity and overparameterization jointly affect forgetting in an analyzable model. Specifically, we focus on two-task continual linear regression, where the second task is a random orthogonal transformation of an arbitrary first task (an abstraction of random permutation tasks). We derive an exact analytical expression for the expected forgetting - and uncover a nuanced pattern. In highly overparameterized models, intermediate task similarity causes the most forgetting. However, near the interpolation threshold, forgetting decreases monotonically with the expected task similarity. We validate our findings with linear regression on synthetic data, and with neural networks on established permutation task benchmarks.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 3122886c-f355-4277-bbb9-4b5a5bbca178Cited by top-tier papers16
- Fine-tuning Reinforcement Learning Models is Secretly a Forgetting Mitigation ProblemMaciej Wolczyk, Bartlomiej Cupial, Mateusz Ostaszewski, Michal Bortkiewicz et al.ICML 2024 · 29 citations
- Disentangling and mitigating the impact of task similarity for continual learningNaoki HirataniNeurIPS 2024 · 21 citations
- Fast Last-Iterate Convergence of SGD in the Smooth Interpolation RegimeAmit Attia, Matan Schliserman, Uri Sherman, Tomer KorenNeurIPS 2025 · 18 citations
- Inductive biases of multi-task learning and finetuning: multiple regimes of feature reuseSamuel Lippl, Jack W. LindseyNeurIPS 2024 · 13 citations
- Optimal Rates in Continual Linear Regression via Increasing RegularizationRan Levinstein, Amit Attia, Matan Schliserman, Uri Sherman et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 10 citations
Builds on7
- Anatomy of Catastrophic Forgetting: Hidden Representations and Task SemanticsVinay Venkatesh Ramasesh, Ethan Dyer, Maithra RaghuICLR 2021 · 207 citations
- A Theoretical Study on Solving Continual LearningGyuhak Kim, Changnan Xiao, Tatsuya Konishi, Zixuan Ke et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 119 citations
- Continual Learning in the Teacher-Student Setup: Impact of Task SimilaritySebastian Lee, Sebastian Goldt, Andrew M. SaxeICML 2021 · 98 citations
- Wide Neural Networks Forget Less CatastrophicallySeyed-Iman Mirzadeh, Arslan Chaudhry, Dong Yin, Huiyi Hu et al.ICML 2022 · 84 citations
- Theory on Forgetting and Generalization of Continual LearningSen Lin, Peizhong Ju, Yingbin Liang, Ness B. ShroffICML 2023 · 74 citations
Related papers
- Understanding Forgetting in Continual Learning with Linear RegressionMeng Ding, Kaiyi Ji, Di Wang, Jinhui XuICML 2024 · 23 citations
- A Theory of Initialisation's Impact on SpecialisationDevon Jarvis, Sebastian Lee, Clémentine Carla Juliette Dominé, Andrew M. Saxe et al.ICLR 2025
- Maslow's Hammer in Catastrophic Forgetting: Node Re-Use vs. Node ActivationSebastian Lee, Stefano Sarao Mannelli, Claudia Clopath, Sebastian Goldt et al.ICML 2022 · 18 citations
- Memory-Statistics Tradeoff in Continual Learning with Structural RegularizationHaoran Li, Jingfeng Wu, Vladimir BravermanICLR 2026 · 4 citations
- Learning curves for continual learning in neural networks: Self-knowledge transfer and forgettingRyo Karakida, Shotaro AkahoICLR 2022 · 16 citations
